The next housing bailout? Big trouble brewing at the FHA
Housing is at the center of the economy. The Federal Housing Administration is at the center of housing. And there's a danger that it could require a historic bailout next year.

Reuters

Article Highlights

  • FHA’s FY2012 Actuarial Study for its main single-family program shows that its capital position has turned negative.

    Tweet This

  • If FHA were a private company, it would be shut down writes @AEIecon’s Edward J. Pinto.

    Tweet This

  • FHA’s mounting fiscal problems portend deep trouble for the housing market and the US economy as a whole.

    Tweet This

  • Pushing families into homes they can't afford is a terrible way to expand the American Dream. #FHA

    Tweet This

There's a growing consensus in America that the long-suffering housing market has reached bottom and is now mounting a recovery. Housing starts surged 15 percent in September to their highest level in four years. New home sales in the same month rose 5.7 percent to their highest level in two years. And the Zillow Home Price Index shows that home prices are up 3.4 percent from a year ago.

While these are welcome trends, figures released today from the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) throw a sobering splash of cold water. FHA's FY 2012 Actuarial Study for its main single family program shows that its capital position has turned negative, by $13.5 billion. That's a shift of $23 billion in economic value in a single year, and it puts the 78-year-old agency $34.5 billion short of its legal capital requirement.

If it were a private company, it would be shut down.

It's bad enough that FHA may be forced to seek a taxpayer bailout, just months after acting FHA Commissioner Carol Galante told Congress that "FHA is not broke." What's worse is that the agency's mounting fiscal problems portend deep trouble for the housing market and the American economy as a whole.

Here's why.

4 WAYS TO FIX THE FHA

The implosion of the government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2008 did not end the government's massive -- and distorting -- role in the housing market. Instead, in the wake of their bailouts (taxpayers have forked over $180 billion and counting), much of the risk was simply shifted to the FHA. Indeed, FHA's insurance portfolio quadrupled in the past 5 years to $1.1 trillion today. The result is that FHA now guarantees 16 percent of all US mortgages, and 30 percent of all new home purchase mortgages. This is not an accidental trend: the FHA deliberately tried to "grow" its way out trouble, essentially betting the house on housing's recovery. Friday's numbers confirm that like Fannie and Freddie, it's easy to gamble when the taxpayer covers your losses.

This wasn't a surprise. Research published last fall by the American Enterprise Institute showed that the agency had become as overleveraged as Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns before their fall. Barring a dramatic economic recovery, the report noted that the increasingly poor-quality loans the FHA absorbed to grow its portfolio would compel the agency to seek a multibillion dollar bailout. Since then, AEI's monthly "FHA Watch" has chronicled the agency's slide into insolvency.

In the short term, Congress has little choice but to recapitalize FHA to make sure it can fulfill its obligations. But fixing the FHA requires far more than plugging a fiscal hole. It requires four fundamental reforms.

First, end the practice of knowingly lending to people who cannot afford to repay their loans. Second, help homeowners establish meaningful equity in their homes. Third, return to the agency's historical roots: concentrate on those who truly need help purchasing their first home. Finally, step back from markets that can be better served by private lenders and insurers.

Together, these changes will transform the FHA from an agency that sets people up to fail to one that actually helps them live the American Dream.

A BETTER AMERICAN DREAM

So far, though, Congress has shown little appetite to rein in the FHA. In fact, lawmakers last year approved a higher loan limit of $729,750 to FHA-insured loans, accelerating the agency's monopoly.

This monopoly goes deeper than the FHA to the underlying government mortgage complex of big lending that's leading to a bad ending. Fannie, Freddie, FHA, Ginnie Mae, and even the USDA act as the five faces of Uncle Sam's home loan shop; they account for 90 percent of all new mortgages. Together with HUD, the complex backed - at taxpayer expense - the toxic mix of low down payments, poor credit scores, and lax oversight that precipitated the sub-prime housing crisis. In concert with the realtors, builders, and other members of the housing lobby, this complex got rich handing people keys with no skin in the game. No matter that the political push for an ownership society resulted in a debtor society, because taxpayers and hapless home buyers covered the bill.

The housing crisis supposedly chastened the complex, but a close look at the FHA's figures show that it's still following this tragic playbook. Over 1 in 6 FHA loans are delinquent 30 days or more. Most of these were originated in 2008, 2009 and 2010, well after the bubble had burst. Today, the agency is still targeting low-income borrowers, pushing them into mortgages with ruinous consequences.

For example, in the first quarter of FY 2012, an estimated 40 percent of FHA's business consists of loans with either one or two subprime attributes -- a FICO score below 660 or a debt ratio greater than or equal to 50 percent. These subprime loans are overwhelmingly risk layered with a loan to value ratio (excluding financed mortgage insurance premium) of equal to or greater than 95 percent and a loan term of 30 years.

As these delinquencies from 2008-2010 turn into foreclosures -- a kind of post-bubble second wave -- they'll put downward price pressure on already-battered neighborhoods, and the nascent housing recovery could quickly reverse course, dragging the economy.

If Friday's report does nothing else, it should underscore the commonsense notion that pushing families into homes they can't afford is a terrible way to expand the American Dream.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Edward J.
Pinto
  • American Enterprise Institute (AEI) resident fellow Edward J. Pinto is the codirector of AEI’s International Center on Housing Risk. He is currently researching policy options for rebuilding the US housing finance sector and specializes in the effect of government housing policies on mortgages, foreclosures, and on the availability of affordable housing for working-class families. Pinto writes AEI’s monthly Housing Risk Watch, which has replaced AEI’s FHA Watch. Along with AEI resident scholar Stephen Oliner, Pinto is the creator and developer of the AEI Pinto-Oliner Mortgage Risk, Collateral Risk, and Capital Adequacy Indexes.


    An executive vice president and chief credit officer for Fannie Mae until the late 1980s, Pinto has done groundbreaking research on the role of federal housing policy in the 2008 mortgage and financial crisis. Pinto’s work on the Government Mortgage Complex includes seminal research papers submitted to the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission: “Government Housing Policies in the Lead-up to the Financial Crisis” and “Triggers of the Financial Crisis.” In December 2012, he completed a study of 2.4 million Federal Housing Administration (FHA)–insured loans and found that FHA policies have resulted in a high proportion of working-class families losing their homes.

    Pinto has a J.D. from Indiana University Maurer School of Law and a B.A. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

  • Phone: 240-423-2848
    Email: edward.pinto@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Emily Rapp
    Phone: 202-419-5212
    Email: emily.rapp@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image The money in banking: Comparing salaries of bank and bank regulatory employees
image What Obama should say about China in Japan
image A key to college success: Involved dads
image China takes the fight to space
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.