Too many Americans are in homes they can't afford

Shutterstock.com

Article Highlights

  • If you want to understand America's foreclosure crisis, look no further than the Federal Housing Administration (FHA).

    Tweet This

  • Recently, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) said it needs $1.7bn to cover losses, the first taxpayer-funded bailout in the organization's 79-year history.

    Tweet This

  • For decades FHA's underwriting practices have put families into homes they can't afford.

    Tweet This

  • FHA must stop inflicting high rates of default and foreclosure on lower income and minority borrowers.

    Tweet This

If you want to understand America's foreclosure crisis, look no further than the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), the organization that insures the mortgages of nearly eight million families. Founded in 1934 in the midst of the Great Depression, the FHA was supposed to stabilize the mortgage market and generally make things better for homeowners. But something went horribly wrong.

Recently, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) said it needs $1.7bn to cover losses, the first taxpayer-funded bailout in the organization's 79-year history. To put that in perspective, if FHA were held to the same standards as private mortgage insurers, it would be insolvent to the tune of $25bn.

While this is bad news for the taxpayers, FHA has an even more troubling problem. For decades FHA's underwriting practices have put families into homes they can't afford. By financing failure, FHA has made foreclosures commonplace. One in eight families getting an FHA loan from 1975 to 2011 has already been or will end up in foreclosure. That's over 3 million families.

This abysmal record is made worse by the fact that lower-income and minority families have suffered from disproportionately higher foreclosure rates – closer to one in five families.

How did it get this bad? In the run-up to the recent housing market collapse, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) forced Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and private lenders to adopt, and even go beyond, FHA's weak underwriting practices. In 2004, HUD even took credit for bringing about looser underwriting by what it termed a "revolution in affordable lending".

FHA continues to sell hope and deliver harm by pushing families into homes they can't afford, saddling them with loans that barely build equity. By tolerating such a high failure rate, families are left in financial ruin and communities are left reeling.

This is in sharp contrast to FHA's early years (1934-59) when foreclosures were uncommon. By the mid-1950s, FHA had pioneered sound underwriting principles based upon balancing down payment, loan term, and debt levels. As late as 1954, down payments and terms on FHA loans averaged about 20% and 20 years, respectively. The National Housing Act of 1934 required FHA to assure that borrowers were not taking on obligations in "excess of his reasonable ability to pay". As a result, home buyers accumulated nearly 30% in earned equity after four years. With housing debt ratios averaging 15%, borrowers with an FHA loan had a cushion to handle adverse income shocks

The FHA began abandoning these principles in the late 1950s and, as a result, foreclosures soared. New underwriting policies encouraged many low- and moderate-income families to make a risky financing decision – one combining poor credit with a 30-year loan term, high debt, and a low down payment. This set up for failure the very families and communities FHA was charged with helping.

Today, families in low- and moderate-income zip codes have a 40% higher expected foreclosure rate than those in zip codes with a median income greater than 110% of the metro area median. Families living in metro area zip codes where the minority percentage is 80% or more have a projected foreclosure rate 60% higher than zip codes where the minority percentage is 20% or less.

A long history of cross-subsidizing high-risk loans with lower-risk loans facilitates FHA's disproportionate impact on lower income and minority families. FHA must stop inflicting these high rates of default and foreclosure on lower income and minority borrowers. FHA should be providing responsible mortgage credit by balancing down payment, loan term, FICO credit score, and debt-to-income level. It should assure that borrowers are not taking on obligations in excess of one's reasonable ability to pay and result in a strong probability that the debt will be paid off in accordance with its terms and should advise each consumer as to his or her foreclosure risk based on an applicant's risk profile. It should ask Congress for authority to hold lenders more responsible by reducing its insurance coverage from 100% to 50%.

These common sense reforms will provide these families with the opportunity to achieve meaningful equity and be mutually advantageous to lenders and the FHA.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Edward J.
Pinto
  • American Enterprise Institute (AEI) resident fellow Edward J. Pinto is the codirector of AEI’s International Center on Housing Risk. He is currently researching policy options for rebuilding the US housing finance sector and specializes in the effect of government housing policies on mortgages, foreclosures, and on the availability of affordable housing for working-class families. Pinto writes AEI’s monthly Housing Risk Watch, which has replaced AEI’s FHA Watch. Along with AEI resident scholar Stephen Oliner, Pinto is the creator and developer of the AEI Pinto-Oliner Mortgage Risk, Collateral Risk, and Capital Adequacy Indexes.


    An executive vice president and chief credit officer for Fannie Mae until the late 1980s, Pinto has done groundbreaking research on the role of federal housing policy in the 2008 mortgage and financial crisis. Pinto’s work on the Government Mortgage Complex includes seminal research papers submitted to the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission: “Government Housing Policies in the Lead-up to the Financial Crisis” and “Triggers of the Financial Crisis.” In December 2012, he completed a study of 2.4 million Federal Housing Administration (FHA)–insured loans and found that FHA policies have resulted in a high proportion of working-class families losing their homes.

    Pinto has a J.D. from Indiana University Maurer School of Law and a B.A. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

  • Phone: 240-423-2848
    Email: edward.pinto@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Emily Rapp
    Phone: 202-419-5212
    Email: emily.rapp@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image The money in banking: Comparing salaries of bank and bank regulatory employees
image What Obama should say about China in Japan
image A key to college success: Involved dads
image China takes the fight to space
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.