"Traditional Banking" Is Indeed Risky
Letter to the Editor

Sir, Clive Crook ("Beware the crisis around the corner," January 4) points out that failed commercial banks "did so mainly through losses in traditional banking." Yes, just as they do each cycle. "Traditional banking," consisting of highly leveraged positions in risky assets, is indeed risky. No one should ever think the contrary.

Mr Crook goes on to say there should be "rules that recognize the credit cycle and change as it proceeds." Right again. The essential new rule of this sort would be that as asset prices accelerate and optimism grows, banking leverage and loan to value ratios must fall, instead of rising, as they typically do.

That the typical financial behavior should thus be made into its opposite is clear in principle. How actually to achieve this, if we exclude illusory faith in regulation, is admittedly murky.

Alex J. Pollock is a resident fellow at AEI.

About the Author

 

Alex J.
Pollock
  • Alex Pollock joined AEI in 2004 after thirty-five years in banking. He was president and chief executive officer of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago from 1991 to 2004. He is the author of numerous articles on financial systems and the organizer of the “Deflating Bubble” series of AEI conferences. In 2007, he developed a one-page mortgage form to help borrowers understand their mortgage obligations. At AEI, he focuses on financial policy issues, including housing finance, government-sponsored enterprises, retirement finance, corporate governance, accounting standards, and the banking system. He is a director of the CME Group, the Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation, the International Union for Housing Finance, and the chairman of the board of the Great Books Foundation.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD ALEX POLLOCK'S ONE-PAGE MORTGAGE FORM
  • Phone: 2028627190
    Email: apollock@aei.org
AEI on Facebook