Ivy League White House Mimics Finance Masters

Shuffle - Kevin A. Hassett Shuffle - Kevin A. Hassett

Senior Fellow
Kevin A. Hassett

If Wall Street was brought down by the Ivy League's supposed best and the brightest--with their complete faith in risk-management models taught in business schools--then who failed to rein them in?

In many cases, their own classmates.

For the last eight years, the squinty-eyed president of the United States, George W. Bush (Yale BA, Harvard MBA), acted in a manner that mirrored that of the risk-lovers of Wall Street. He was the "decider" who put 100 percent faith in his own judgment, often casting aside prudent hedges that would have been a respectful nod to his critics for fear of showing weakness.

But there is wisdom in weakness.

This worldwide crisis has few precedents, so history offers little in the way of guidance. Show me a person who knows for sure what we should do, and I'll show you someone who needs medication.

The age of humility and second opinions is coming. The problem is, it's not here yet.

We may have traded a cocky Harvard MBA for a cocky Harvard-trained lawyer, Barack Obama. It shouldn't surprise us, even this early in the new administration, that little appears to have changed.

Take a look at the stimulus package. The economics literature is divided on the best countercyclical recipe.

Keynes and Lucas

The Keynesian school, which for many years has found its gravitational center in Cambridge, Massachusetts, is optimistic about the benefits of higher government spending and temporary tax rebates.

The neoclassical school, which emerged from the Nobel Prize-winning work of Robert Lucas of the University of Chicago, believes that Keynesian stimulus is ineffective and marginal tax rate reductions work better.

We are currently experiencing the worst economy of our lifetimes. Given the stakes, wouldn't it be prudent to pass a stimulus bill that tries a little bit of each type of medicine? That way, the risk of economic catastrophe would be significantly reduced if either school of thought is correct.

Instead, we get a measure that is entirely Keynesian. The $787 billion stimulus package that Obama signed on Feb. 17 contains roughly $288 billion in tax measures, and those intended to be stimulative are 100 percent Keynesian.

The biggest measure is the "making work pay" credit, a payroll tax cut worth as much as $400 for singles and $800 for married couples.

Billions to Spend

The remainder of the stimulus package is allocated among various Keynesian spending measures, including $144 billion for local and state governments, $111 billion for infrastructure spending and roughly $81 billion in additional funding to protect the vulnerable. The remaining spending is directed toward various health-care, energy and education measures.

There isn't a single neoclassical-style reduction of marginal tax rates in the law. Anyone who watched Wall Street implode because people put too much faith in a single view of how the world works should be nervous.

Which brings about the question: How can it be that the U.S. government has bet its future 100 percent on Keynes?

The answer is that the economic decision makers in the Obama administration are highly homogenous. One might even argue that the Obama administration is one of the least diverse in modern times.

Harvard lawyer Obama handed the keys of the economic team to former Harvard President Larry Summers. Summers is, without doubt, on the short list of the greatest economists I have ever met. Before he entered public life, his work was often miraculous.

Drank the Water

But collectively, the team that he assembled is long on people who are predisposed to agree with him and short on those who steered clear of the Keynesian water of Cambridge.

The list of Cambridge insiders includes the chairwoman of Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, Christina Romer (MIT); council members Cecilia Rouse (Harvard) and Austan Goolsbee (MIT); and even senior adviser Paul Volcker (Harvard). All told, of the 27 top advisers on the White House economic team or its Economic Recovery Advisory Board, 14 went to Harvard or MIT and 20 are Ivy Leaguers. As an individual, each of these team members is worthy of bipartisan praise. As a group, there is a disappointing lack of diversity.

Is it any wonder, then, that we would see a stimulus package that puts so much faith in Keynesianism? It would be like inviting only American League fans to a debate about the designated hitter.

The fear is that the same kind of hubris that brought down Wall Street will now do the same for everything else. The Keynesian school better be right. If not, we are all in for a long and terrible ride.

Kevin A. Hassett is a senior fellow and the director of economic policy studies at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author


Kevin A.
  • Kevin A. Hassett is the State Farm James Q. Wilson Chair in American Politics and Culture at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). He is also a resident scholar and AEI's director of economic policy studies.

    Before joining AEI, Hassett was a senior economist at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and an associate professor of economics and finance at Columbia (University) Business School. He served as a policy consultant to the US Department of the Treasury during the George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton administrations.

    Hassett has also been an economic adviser to presidential candidates since 2000, when he became the chief economic adviser to Senator John McCain during that year's presidential primaries. He served as an economic adviser to the George W. Bush 2004 presidential campaign, a senior economic adviser to the McCain 2008 presidential campaign, and an economic adviser to the Mitt Romney 2012 presidential campaign.

    Hassett is the author or editor of many books, among them "Rethinking Competitiveness" (2012), "Toward Fundamental Tax Reform" (2005), "Bubbleology: The New Science of Stock Market Winners and Losers" (2002), and "Inequality and Tax Policy" (2001). He is also a columnist for National Review and has written for Bloomberg.

    Hassett frequently appears on Bloomberg radio and TV, CNBC, CNN, Fox News Channel, NPR, and "PBS NewsHour," among others. He is also often quoted by, and his opinion pieces have been published in, the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post.

    Hassett has a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Pennsylvania and a B.A. in economics from Swarthmore College.

  • Phone: 202-862-7157
    Email: khassett@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Emma Bennett
    Phone: 202-862-5862
    Email: emma.bennett@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image The Census Bureau and Obamacare: Dumb decision? Yes. Conspiracy? No.
image A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
image Give the CBO long-range tools
image The coming collapse of India's communists
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
Wednesday, April 16, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.
Calling treason by its name: A conversation with Liam Fox

Join us at AEI as the Right Honorable Liam Fox sits down with Marc Thiessen to discuss and debate whether America’s intelligence agencies have infringed on the personal privacy of US citizens.

Thursday, April 17, 2014 | 4:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.
The curmudgeon's guide to getting ahead

How can young people succeed in workplaces dominated by curmudgeons who are judging their every move? At this AEI book event, bestselling author and social scientist Charles Murray will offer indispensable advice for navigating the workplace, getting ahead, and living a fulfilling life.

Event Registration is Closed
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.