Letter to the editor: There are issues with a revenue-neutral carbon tax

This letter is a response to an op-ed "Why We Support a Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax" by George P. Shultz and Gary S. Becker from April 8, 2013.

The authors may believe that carbon (dioxide) is a "major pollutant," but nowhere in their op-ed do we find a hint about the actual environmental benefits attendant upon the imposition of a carbon tax. The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's best estimate of the temperature effect of a doubling of carbon-dioxide concentrations by 2100 is three degrees Celsius. U.S. emissions of greenhouse gases are about 18% of global emissions, so that our contribution would be about 0.5 degrees. If we were to cut that in half---an impossible goal economically---the reduction in U.S. "pollution" would be 0.2-0.3 degrees, the climate effect of which would be unmeasurable.

There is nothing "efficient" about a tax that yields no benefit, and were the tax to be imposed by international agreement (a tax cartel), efficiency would be the least likely outcome. Their call for revenue (actually, spending) "neutrality" would not yield greater efficiency because there is no particular reason to believe that carbon emissions are a useful proxy for the benefits of government spending. Messrs. Shultz and Becker have given us an idea truly half-baked, which on the plus side probably reduced their carbon footprint. 

Benjamin Zycher is a visiting scholar at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Benjamin
Zycher

What's new on AEI

To secure southern border, US must lead international effort to stabilize Central America
image The Ryan pro-work, anti-poverty plan: Thomas Aquinas 1, Ayn Rand 0
image Does SNAP support work? Yes and no
image Obama Democrats lose their big bet on health exchanges
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Monday, July 21, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
Closing the gaps in health outcomes: Alternative paths forward

Please join us for a broader exploration of targeted interventions that provide real promise for reducing health disparities, limiting or delaying the onset of chronic health conditions, and improving the performance of the US health care system.

Monday, July 21, 2014 | 4:00 p.m. – 5:30 p.m.
Comprehending comprehensive universities

Join us for a panel discussion that seeks to comprehend the comprehensives and to determine the role these schools play in the nation’s college completion agenda.

Tuesday, July 22, 2014 | 8:50 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Who governs the Internet? A conversation on securing the multistakeholder process

Please join AEI’s Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy for a conference to address key steps we can take, as members of the global community, to maintain a free Internet.

Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Expanding opportunity in America: A conversation with House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan

Please join us as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) unveils a new set of policy reforms aimed at reducing poverty and increasing upward mobility throughout America.

Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 6:00 p.m. – 7:15 p.m.
Is it time to end the Export-Import Bank?

We welcome you to join us at AEI as POLITICO’s Ben White moderates a lively debate between Tim Carney, one of the bank’s fiercest critics, and Tony Fratto, one of the agency’s staunchest defenders.

Event Registration is Closed
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.