Pension Fund Politics
The Dangers of Socially Responsible Investing

Click here to view the full book as an Adobe PDF.

Public employee retirement funds collectively hold almost $2 trillion in assets. Should the government and union officials entrusted with managing this money make investment decisions guided by their political views? Should personal morality and ideology, which vary dramatically across the country, influence public investments, including Social Security?

Traditionally, public investments have been managed according to strict fiduciary principles designed to protect the retirement security of America’s teachers, fire fighters, police officers, and other public workers. That tradition is now under assault. In some state and local governments, politicians responsible for overseeing these funds are embracing highly controversial and potentially risky investment criteria known as “socially responsible investing.” Pension Fund Politics examines this controversial trend. An ideologically diverse group of scholars address the legal, political, and fiduciary consequences of injecting social and ethical criteria into the management of pension funds.

Certainly, as part of their fiduciary mandate to maximize investment returns for their beneficiaries, pension-fund trustees have a duty to press for changes in corporate behavior that could result in better returns for their pension holders. But judging by the actions of many activists now running multi-billion dollar pension funds, using social investing under the guise of increasing “shareholder value” threatens to undermine the financial security of retirees who have no say in these highly politicized investment decisions. The authors argue that social investing, by both the political left and right, frequently ends up hurting the very people—particularly the economically disadvantaged—that it is supposed to help. Pension funds are being dragged into treacherous waters where political grandstanding or moral righteousness threatens clear financial mandates. In many instances, social investing amounts to little more than ideologically driven gambling with other people’s money.

Jon H. Entine is a scholar in residence at Miami University (Ohio) and an adjunct fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Jon
Entine

What's new on AEI

Obama should channel Reagan on Russia
image Tackling our nation’s budget problems, head on
image Missing the point on inversions and corporate taxes
image Venezuela betrayed — missed chance to expose regime
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 28
    MON
  • 29
    TUE
  • 30
    WED
  • 31
    THU
  • 01
    FRI
Tuesday, July 29, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Is Medicare's future secure? The 2014 Trustees Report

Please join AEI as the chief actuary for Medicare summarizes the report’s results, followed by a panel discussion of what those spending trends are likely to mean for seniors, taxpayers, the health industry, and federal policy.

Friday, August 01, 2014 | 10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Watergate revisited: The reforms and the reality, 40 years later

Please join us as four of Washington’s most distinguished political observers will revisit the Watergate hearings and discuss reforms that followed.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.