Your editorial on the challenges facing Abenomics (August 14) seems to offer the Japanese prime minister contradictory policy advice. On the one hand, despite the fact that, at around 36 per cent, Japanese corporate tax rates are among the highest in the OECD, you suggest that more of the fiscal burden should be placed on the country’s cash-rich companies to lighten the tax load on families.
On the other, you suggest that Shinzo Abe should make every effort to persuade businesses to inject new cash into the economy. The sad reality is that the highly compromised state of Japan’s public finances, as reflected in a gross public debt to gross domestic product ratio of 240 per cent and a primary budget deficit of over 6 per cent of GDP, leaves the country with little option but to engage in large-scale, medium-term fiscal consolidation.
This is all the more so the case considering that the country’s very poor demographics will continue to undermine its long-run savings performance. According to IMF calculations, beyond 2015 Japan will need further fiscal measures totalling around 6.5 per cent of GDP over and above the second planned VAT increase to place the public debt to GDP ratio on a declining path.
The main policy lesson from Japan’s second quarter tax-induced economic slump would seem to be that not only must Mr Abe strengthen the third arrow of his strategy by engaging in more serious structural economic reform as your editorial correctly suggests. Rather, it would seem that the Bank of Japan must be prepared to engage in an even more activist policy of quantitative easing than it has been doing to date. It should do so in order to facilitate a further significant weakening of the currency that might allow the country to rebalance its public finances without risking another deflationary economic recession.
Desmond Lachman, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, US