Major changes to Social Security are needed

Reuters

Sherri (C) and Curtis Walker (R) go over retirement options with Calpers Benefit Program Specialist Lisa Bacon (L) at the Calpers regional office in Sacramento, California, October 21, 2009.

Article Highlights

  • While Social Security reform wouldn’t fix today’s deficits, it would make a deficit deal easier to reach.

    Tweet This

  • Many say Social Security reform should not be part of the budget negotiations. That isn’t so.

    Tweet This

  • Reforms to reduce benefits for high earners and prolong work lives could restore solvency while improving the safety net.

    Tweet This

Editor's note: The following article originally appeared in The New York Times' Room for Debate in response to the question: "Does Social Security need to be dealt with in the current fiscal negotiations?"

Many say Social Security reform should not be part of the budget negotiations, arguing that Social Security contributes “not a penny” to the budget deficit. That isn’t so.

The growing gap between Social Security’s dedicated tax income and expenditures will contribute to both the unified budget deficit and the publicly held national debt, the most common and economically meaningful budget measures.

We shouldn’t fix the budget deficit simply by cutting Social Security – and we won’t. Even using the “chained” measure of inflation reduces outlays by only 2.5 percent over 10 years. Major reforms, like raising the retirement age, take effect only over decades, with the savings credited back to prolong Social Security’s solvency.

While Social Security reform wouldn’t fix today’s deficits, it would make a deficit deal easier to reach. Conservatives are concerned that tax increases today won’t be followed by promised spending cuts.

But cuts to entitlements like Social Security would automatically be enacted unless Congress intervened. If you want Republicans to agree to higher revenues, the spending cuts need to be credible.

Finally, why wouldn’t you want to fix Social Security? It’s the largest tax most workers pay, the largest income source for most retirees and the largest domestic spending program, with costs rising by 25 percent relative to its tax base over the next two decades.

Over the next decade Social Security costs will rise more than Medicare’s, and when the trust fund is exhausted in early the 2030s, retirement benefits would be cut 25 percent. The disability program is in even worse shape, with insolvency projected for 2016.

Targeted reforms to reduce benefits for high earners and prolong work lives could restore solvency while improving the safety net.

Raising the retirement age to track rising lifespans would reduce the growth of Social Security costs and encourage Americans to delay retirement, helping both their own retirement preparations and boosting economic growth.
The Bowles-Simpson commission proposed gradually raising the retirement age to 69 by 2075.

Many of those arguing to separate Social Security from budget talks seem to want to push reform off the table altogether. But while the Social Security shortfall is smaller than Medicare’s, it’s large compared to pretty much anything else in the budget. It deserves to be fixed.

Andrew G. Biggs is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and former principal deputy commissioner of the Social Security Administration.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Andrew G.
Biggs

What's new on AEI

In year four of Dodd-Frank, over-regulation is getting old
image Halbig v. Burwell: A stunning rebuke of a lawless and reckless administration
image Beware all the retirement 'crisis' reports
image Cut people or change how they're paid
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Monday, July 21, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
Closing the gaps in health outcomes: Alternative paths forward

Please join us for a broader exploration of targeted interventions that provide real promise for reducing health disparities, limiting or delaying the onset of chronic health conditions, and improving the performance of the US health care system.

Monday, July 21, 2014 | 4:00 p.m. – 5:30 p.m.
Comprehending comprehensive universities

Join us for a panel discussion that seeks to comprehend the comprehensives and to determine the role these schools play in the nation’s college completion agenda.

Tuesday, July 22, 2014 | 8:50 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Who governs the Internet? A conversation on securing the multistakeholder process

Please join AEI’s Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy for a conference to address key steps we can take, as members of the global community, to maintain a free Internet.

Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Expanding opportunity in America: A conversation with House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan

Please join us as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) unveils a new set of policy reforms aimed at reducing poverty and increasing upward mobility throughout America.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 6:00 p.m. – 7:15 p.m.
Is it time to end the Export-Import Bank?

We welcome you to join us at AEI as POLITICO’s Ben White moderates a lively debate between Tim Carney, one of the bank’s fiercest critics, and Tony Fratto, one of the agency’s staunchest defenders.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.