Republicans should stand and fight over the shutdown

Reuters

Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) speaks to reporters during the 14th day of the partial government shut down in Washington on October 14, 2013.

Article Highlights

  • At this point, Republican offers for the shutdown are reasonable -@stanveuger

    Tweet This

  • Republicans should fight over the shutdown, not debt ceiling -@stanveuger

    Tweet This

  • Right now, it's the Democrats who aren't compromising

    Tweet This

President Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid are continuing to, as they would say, hold the country hostage. Republicans have, at this point, adopted utterly reasonable positions. They are willing to raise the debt limit. They are willing to fund the federal government at current levels. All they want in exchange are certain tweaks to Obamacare. These tweaks are meant to address a couple of the most undesirable features of President Obama’s health care reform, the most transformational piece of legislation ever to have passed on a razor-thin party-line vote.

Let’s focus on the debt ceiling first. A failure to raise the debt limit would have terrible consequences for everyone involved. It is commendable that Speaker Boehner appears willing to lift the limit in exchange for a discussion of the country’s long-term fiscal outlook. Such a discussion is overdue, and it would be extraordinarily helpful if the looming cost explosions associated with the growth of Medicare and Social Security were addressed now. Postponing entitlement reform would reduce the set of feasible solutions and make transitioning to alternative social insurance schemes significantly more painful.

Raising the debt limit, albeit temporarily, is something I would support even without any kind of concession from the Democrat side. It would allow Congress and the president to focus on the ongoing budget negotiations. In those negotiations, again, the latest movement on the Republican side has been focused on reaching agreement, not on racking up political victories or spouting vile vitriol that portrays the duly elected, peacefully assembled representatives of about half the population as arsonists, jihadis, and terrorists.
"In those negotiations, again, the latest movement on the Republican side has been focused on reaching agreement, not on racking up political victories or spouting vile vitriol" - Stan Veuger
What Republicans are asking for right now in exchange for a new continuing resolution, in a proposal put together by Senator Susan Collins (R-ME), is fairly straightforward, and is limited to two things.

One, they ask for a two-year delay in the medical device excise tax included in the Affordable Care Act: not an unreasonable  proposal, both because the tax would bring in only limited amounts of revenue and because it was only included to make Obamacare look artificially affordable to begin with. (No one is seriously arguing that medical devices produce unbearable negative externalities or that in an ideal world all medical devices would be banned.)

Two, the Collins proposal demands that incomes be verified before Obamacare subsidies are paid out to those claiming to be entitled to them. This, again, is not an unreasonable request. If you are going to have a massive income redistribution as a  part of your health insurance system, you should certainly make sure that the subsidies you are handing out go to the right  people.

It is important for Congress to force the administration to be more transparent and accountable for its payouts, particularly in the aftermath of the Pigford scandal. In Pigford v. Glickman, African-American farmers alleged that they had  been discriminated against by the federal government when it came to awarding USDA farm loans. These legitimate grievances  were, as the New York Times reported earlier this week, exploited by political appointees in President Obama’s Department of Justice to start writing $50,000 checks indiscriminately to a wide variety of Democrat-preferred constituencies, without any kind of checks or control. One could argue that the Department of Justice would not be in charge of writing Obamacare checks. Yet, as we learned from the IRS’ targeting of conservative organizations, the Department of Justice is not the only part of the executive branch that puts partisan political goals ahead of taxpayer interests.

How have the president and Senate Democrats responded to this Republican desire to reach agreement? So far, by refusing to accept Republican offers, including the Collins plan. This cannot go on. President Obama is not the Emperor of Austria-Hungary: he needs to be willing to compromise and recognize the legitimate role the minority in the Senate and the majority in the House of Representatives play in running the country. Especially when they come up with proposals that are good public policy for him.

Republicans, at the same time, should not cave. They need not worry about the electoral consequences for now, despite what polls show: even Nate Silver believes that their control of the House of Representatives is nowhere near in danger, and that is before they have reaped the payoff from using this standoff to accomplish some of the things they ran on in 2010 and 2012. If they give in to the president’s demands for a continuing resolution designed by and for himself, they undermine the system of checks and balances the Constitution so carefully constructed.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Stan
Veuger

  • Stan Veuger is a resident scholar at AEI.  His academic research focuses on political economy, and has been published in The Quarterly Journal of Economics. He writes frequently for popular audiences on a variety of topics, including health and tax policy. He is a regular contributor to The Hill, The National Interest, U.S. News & World Report, and AEIdeas, AEI’s policy blog. Before joining AEI, Dr. Veuger was a teaching fellow at Harvard University and Universitat Pompeu Fabra. He is a board member of the Netherland-American Foundation in Washington and at The Bulwark, a quarterly public policy journal, and was a National Review Institute Washington Fellow. He is a graduate of Utrecht University and Erasmus University Rotterdam, and holds an M.Sc. in Economics from Universitat Pompeu Fabra, as well as A.M. and Ph.D. degrees, also in Economics, from Harvard University. His academic research website can be found here.


    Follow Stan Veuger on Twitter.

  • Phone: 202-862-5894
    Email: stan.veuger@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Emma Bennett
    Phone: 202-862-5862
    Email: emma.bennett@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image The Census Bureau and Obamacare: Dumb decision? Yes. Conspiracy? No.
image A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
image Give the CBO long-range tools
image The coming collapse of India's communists
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 14
    MON
  • 15
    TUE
  • 16
    WED
  • 17
    THU
  • 18
    FRI
Wednesday, April 16, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.
Calling treason by its name: A conversation with Liam Fox

Join us at AEI as the Right Honorable Liam Fox sits down with Marc Thiessen to discuss and debate whether America’s intelligence agencies have infringed on the personal privacy of US citizens.

Thursday, April 17, 2014 | 4:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.
The curmudgeon's guide to getting ahead

How can young people succeed in workplaces dominated by curmudgeons who are judging their every move? At this AEI book event, bestselling author and social scientist Charles Murray will offer indispensable advice for navigating the workplace, getting ahead, and living a fulfilling life.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.