Tax deductions have a purpose

A view of Harvard University campus and Holworth Hall on the right and Stoughton Hall on the left in the late autumn when most of the leaves have fallen on Nov. 20, 2010.

Article Highlights

  • No, the government shouldn’t eliminate tax breaks for private universities:

    Tweet This

  • Princeton spent $110 million on student aid last year, many of them would not be attending Princeton absent that aid.

    Tweet This

  • Zeroing out the deduction for private institutions to address noxious extravagances is a cure that’s worse than the disease

    Tweet This

Should government change its tax exemption policies for universities as a way of equalizing educational resources in America? Read More >>

No, the government shouldn’t eliminate tax breaks for private universities. The bigger question of deductions is a complex one. If the proposal were to zero out charitable deductions as part of broader tax reform, that’d be one thing.

"Today’s charitable contributions to private institutions help to fund scholarships for low-income students." - Frederick M. HessHere, however, the question is simpler. The United States Congress first adopted the deduction for gifts to "religious, charitable, scientific or educational" institutions in 1917. Such gifts frequently complement or even substitute for government programs. The intent was to safeguard the web of private institutions that, as Tocqueville observed a century before, undergird our democracy, anchor our communities and act as a firebreak on government.

Today, as Uncle Sam’s reach steadily expands into the financing and regulation of higher education, those on the left and the right who value independent institutions of higher learning should find particular comfort in this practice.

What about the nifty-sounding idea of using the new tax dollars to expand access? Well, the federal government has boosted outlays on higher education by 250 percent, to $170 billion a year, in the past decade. Most of this funding has gone to public institutions. Against this backdrop, the $5 billion or so the proposal would raise seems unlikely to have much impact.

Meanwhile, today’s charitable contributions to private institutions help to fund scholarships for low-income students. For instance, Princeton University has come under fire in this debate, but it’s worth noting that Princeton spent $110 million on student aid last year — providing 60 percent of its students with an average of $35,000. Many of them would not be attending Princeton, absent that aid.

Finally, let’s keep in mind that many public institutions collect a lot more in charitable giving than their private counterparts. I’m not sure why deep-pocketed public institutions like the University of Texas or Ohio State should get to keep raking in deductible gifts alongside state funds, while the Baylors and Oberlins of the world are penalized.

The proposal has a certain facile appeal. But zeroing out the deduction for private institutions to address some noxious extravagances is a cure that’s worse than the disease.

Frederick M. Hess is the director of education policy studies at AEI and author, most recently, of "The Same Thing Over and Over."

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Frederick M.
Hess

What's new on AEI

AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters
image A nation divided by marriage
image Teaching reform
image Socialist party pushing $20 minimum wage defends $13-an-hour job listing
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 27
    MON
  • 28
    TUE
  • 29
    WED
  • 30
    THU
  • 31
    FRI
Monday, October 27, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
State income taxes and the Supreme Court: Maryland Comptroller v. Wynne

Please join AEI for a panel discussion exploring these and other questions about this crucial case.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014 | 9:30 a.m. – 12:15 p.m.
For richer, for poorer: How family structures economic success in America

Join Lerman, Wilcox, and a group of distinguished scholars and commentators for the release of Lerman and Wilcox’s report, which examines the relationships among and policy implications of marriage, family structure, and economic success in America.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014 | 5:30 p.m. – 7:00 p.m.
The 7 deadly virtues: 18 conservative writers on why the virtuous life is funny as hell

Please join AEI for a book forum moderated by Last and featuring five of these leading conservative voices. By the time the forum is over, attendees may be on their way to discovering an entirely different — and better — moral universe.

Thursday, October 30, 2014 | 2:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
A nuclear deal with Iran? Weighing the possibilities

Join us, as experts discuss their predictions for whether the United States will strike a nuclear deal with Iran ahead of the November 24 deadline, and the repercussions of the possible outcomes.

Thursday, October 30, 2014 | 5:00 p.m. – 6:15 p.m.
The forgotten depression — 1921: The crash that cured itself

Please join Author James Grant and AEI senior economists for a discussion about Grant's book, "The Forgotten Depression: 1921: The Crash That Cured Itself" (Simon & Schuster, 2014).

No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.