Don't blame vouchers for poor science instruction

Shutterstock.com

Article Highlights

  • .@MQ_McShane explains why vouchers will allow parents a way out if they don't like a school's curriculum.@MQ_McShane says don't blame vouchers for poor science instructionCreationism is taught in some schools; if you don't like that, vouchers can be a way out

    Tweet This

Re: “Science has a spot in voucher debates” (My View, April 16).

I share Brandon Haught’s desire for sound science education in Florida. I, too, am troubled that schools teach creationism, a nonscientific, ahistorical account of the origins of our world and our species.

Where Haught and I differ, though, is in our interpretation of the role school vouchers play in promoting such teaching.

Let me start with some facts.

Gallup polling consistently finds about 45 percent of the population of the United States believing in creationism. Note, this cannot possibly be attributed to the pernicious effects of vouchers, or private schools writ large, as approximately one half of 1 percent of students participate in voucher programs and at no point in the last 50 years have more than 12 percent or so of students attended private schools.

It appears that large numbers of students are graduating from public schools as creationists.

How could something like this happen?

Well, in a 2011 issue of Science magazine, Penn State political scientists Michael Berkman and Eric Plutzer surveyed a nationally representative sample of public high-school biology teachers and found that only 28 percent of them consistently implement National Research Council standards for the teaching of evolution.

Thirteen percent of biology teachers explicitly teach creationism or intelligent design. Sixty percent hedge by neither strongly advocating for evolution or creationism.

In fact, public schools do not have a particularly good track record in teaching most scientific topics.

On the most recent administration of the National Assessment for Education Progress, only 28 percent of Florida students scored proficient or better on the science portion of the exam. This occurs even though the state has enumerated science standards and tests students regularly on them. Clearly, those administrative tools are not enough to ensure fidelity to sound science pedagogy.

But on the specific issue of creationism, the explanation is relatively straightforward. Public schools teach creationism because they are, at their core, political institutions. They are governed by elected officials. If a majority of the voting public in a particular jurisdiction believes in creationism, they will advocate for creationism to be taught in the public schools.\

In 2008, Louisiana passed the Science Education Act, which allowed public-school teachers to supplement science instruction with texts critical of evolution. In 2012, Tennessee passed a similar law. From 2005 to 2007, Kansas science standards promoted intelligent design and “teaching the controversy” about evolution and creationism. If you have time, watch the documentary “The Revisionaries,” which chronicles the Texas State Board of Education’s efforts to include creationism in public schools.

This is the cold reality of living in a big, diverse, pluralistic society — sometimes folks believe stuff that we think is dumb, and sometimes those folks win elections.

So what do you do if you are a person who lives in an area where the preponderance of the voting population believes in creationism? If you’re wealthier, you can move to the attendance zone of a school that teaches evolution or pay for your child to attend a private school that offers the correct interpretation of scientific history. If you’re poor, you’re out of luck. You will be legally compelled to send your child to a public school that teaches something you know is wrong.

That is, unless your state has a voucher program.

Then, you can use that voucher to attend a school that doesn’t promote creationism. Sure, schools that promote creationism will still exist, and will be supported by tax dollars, and that is unfortunate. But no one will be legally compelled to attend them, unlike now. All things considered, that is a step in the right direction.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Michael Q.
McShane

What's new on AEI

To secure southern border, US must lead international effort to stabilize Central America
image The Ryan pro-work, anti-poverty plan: Thomas Aquinas 1, Ayn Rand 0
image Does SNAP support work? Yes and no
image Obama Democrats lose their big bet on health exchanges
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Monday, July 21, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
Closing the gaps in health outcomes: Alternative paths forward

Please join us for a broader exploration of targeted interventions that provide real promise for reducing health disparities, limiting or delaying the onset of chronic health conditions, and improving the performance of the US health care system.

Monday, July 21, 2014 | 4:00 p.m. – 5:30 p.m.
Comprehending comprehensive universities

Join us for a panel discussion that seeks to comprehend the comprehensives and to determine the role these schools play in the nation’s college completion agenda.

Tuesday, July 22, 2014 | 8:50 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Who governs the Internet? A conversation on securing the multistakeholder process

Please join AEI’s Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy for a conference to address key steps we can take, as members of the global community, to maintain a free Internet.

Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Expanding opportunity in America: A conversation with House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan

Please join us as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) unveils a new set of policy reforms aimed at reducing poverty and increasing upward mobility throughout America.

Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 6:00 p.m. – 7:15 p.m.
Is it time to end the Export-Import Bank?

We welcome you to join us at AEI as POLITICO’s Ben White moderates a lively debate between Tim Carney, one of the bank’s fiercest critics, and Tony Fratto, one of the agency’s staunchest defenders.

Event Registration is Closed
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.