No thanks very much: Critics of public-school philanthropy overstate their case

World Economic Forum

Melinda French Gates and Bill Gates speak during the 'Gates Foundation' press conference at the Annual Meeting 2009 of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, January 30, 2009.

Article Highlights

  • When it comes to K-12 schooling, folks giving away millions have been slammed for their trouble

    Tweet This

  • Ravitch and her imitators are on to something when they observe that funders seem to be having an outsized impact

    Tweet This

  • relatively tiny, agile funders are able to move where muscle-bound state and district school systems, for all their billions, are stuck

    Tweet This

Normally, we expect to get thanked when giving a few bucks to a good cause. When it comes to K-12 schooling, though, folks giving away millions have been slammed for their trouble.

Critics have accused the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and other deep-pocketed donors of trying to “buy” America’s schools. These critics exaggerate the influence of education philanthropy even as their overheated claims distract from the real issues posed by today’s savvy givers.

Education historian Diane Ravitch has attacked this “billionaire boys’ club,” declaring, “Bill Gates is using his vast resources to impose his will on the nation and to subvert the democratic process.” In the introduction to his recent book, “The Gift of Education,” DePaul University professor Kenneth Saltman writes: “The new philanthropy is at the forefront of a right-wing movement to corporatize education at multiple levels.”

These attacks have fueled much confusion, leading even more measured observers to wonder about the influence that these foundations are exerting on our public schools. In truth, even big-dollar philanthropy is pretty minuscule when viewed alongside our nation’s K-12 spending.

"In truth, even big-dollar philanthropy is pretty minuscule when viewed alongside our nation’s K-12 spending."--Frederick M. Hess

The five biggest K-12 givers in 2010 (the most recent year for which data are available) were the Gates Foundation ($209 million), the Walton Family Foundation ($110 million), the W.K. Kellogg Foundation ($58 million), the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation ($55 million) and the Silicon Valley Community Foundation ($35 million). The top 10 donors gave about $585 million in total, and the Foundation Center has reported total foundation giving that year of about $983 million to K-12 schooling. (Full disclosure: My own work is funded, in part, by foundations including Walton and Gates.)

This seems like a lot of money, but how significant is it really? Well, that $983 million amounts to less than one-sixth of 1 percent of the $650 billion that the U.S. spent on K-12 education in 2009-10. Indeed, all reported giving in 2010 was less than 5 percent of what New York City alone spent that year. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg gave an enormous, much-discussed gift of $100 million to the Newark, N.J., school system in 2010. His total gift, to be parceled out over five years, will amount to about 2 percent of that system’s spending during that time. As University of Arkansas professor Jay Greene wryly noted in 2005, we spend so much on public schools that even hundreds of millions given in philanthropy is like  tossing “buckets into the sea.”

That said, it is also true that “reform-minded” donors like the Gates and Walton foundations have figured out how to powerfully leverage their investments. For instance, $60 million in donor support (from the Walton, Broad, Robertson and Arnold foundations) proved critical in helping former Washington, D.C., Chancellor Michelle Rhee fund and win passage of a path-breaking collective bargaining agreement in 2010. Funders have also been critical in the burgeoning success of influential advocacy groups like Stand for Children, Advance Illinois, and ConnCAN. A wave of philanthropy has played a critical role in creating a charter-centric New Orleans school system that has posted impressive results and become a national model for charter advocates.

Whether one likes the reform agenda or not, it’s clear that Ravitch and her imitators are on to something when they observe that funders seem to be having an outsized impact. The reason for this is simple, and important.

Philanthropic dollars have an outsized influence because the vast majority of public funding is locked into salaries, benefits, bureaucracy and buildings. About 80 to 85 percent of school system dollars are steered into salaries and benefits alone. Paralyzed by regulations, contracts and a lack of imagination, superintendents find it hard to redeploy more than a tiny sliver of public funds.

Thus the success of education philanthropy is no conspiracy. And it’s not a consequence of huge dollars. Rather, it’s a case of relatively tiny, agile funders being able to move where muscle-bound state and district school systems, for all their billions, are stuck. Think Mighty Mouse, not Godzilla.

"It’s a case of relatively tiny, agile funders being able to move where muscle-bound state and district school systems...are stuck. Think Mighty Mouse, not Godzilla."--Frederick M. HessNow, such foundation giving is not unprecedented, but it is much more common today than it was a decade ago. And foundations investing more heavily in policy, big reforms and quasi-partnerships with the U.S. Department of Education pose new challenges.

There are legitimate concerns about the perils of groupthink: that foundations are close-mindedly wedded to pet reformers or consultants who tell them only what they want to hear, and that academics may be disinclined to challenge deep-pocketed funders.

So the skeptics do have a point. But here’s the irony: Their overblown attacks on the motives of philanthropists only ensure that their substantial concerns will get lost amid the invective. Meanwhile, the shrillness of these critics causes reformers to dig in even deeper. The sad upshot of this is a growing difficulty in having civil, informed debate about the wisdom of philanthropic efforts or reforms to teacher evaluation, charter schooling and the rest.

Those seeking to help remake American schooling should welcome tough-minded criticism. But a little gratitude — and a little less hysteria on the part of their critics — wouldn’t hurt, either.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Frederick M.
Hess
  • An educator, political scientist and author, Frederick M. Hess studies K-12 and higher education issues. His books include "Cage-Busting Leadership," "Breakthrough Leadership in the Digital Age," "The Same Thing Over and Over," "Education Unbound," "Common Sense School Reform," "Revolution at the Margins," and "Spinning Wheels." He is also the author of the popular Education Week blog, "Rick Hess Straight Up." Hess's work has appeared in scholarly and popular outlets such as Teachers College Record, Harvard Education Review, Social Science Quarterly, Urban Affairs Review, American Politics Quarterly, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Phi Delta Kappan, Educational Leadership, U.S. News & World Report, National Affairs, the Washington Post, the New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, the Atlantic and National Review. He has edited widely cited volumes on the Common Core, the role of for-profits in education, education philanthropy, school costs and productivity, the impact of education research, and No Child Left Behind.  Hess serves as executive editor of Education Next, as lead faculty member for the Rice Education Entrepreneurship Program, and on the review boards for the Broad Prize in Urban Education and the Broad Prize for Public Charter Schools. He also serves on the boards of directors of the National Association of Charter School Authorizers and 4.0 SCHOOLS. A former high school social studies teacher, he teaches or has taught at the University of Virginia, the University of Pennsylvania, Georgetown University, Rice University and Harvard University. He holds an M.A. and Ph.D. in Government, as well as an M.Ed. in Teaching and Curriculum, from Harvard University.


    Follow AEI Education Policy on Twitter


    Follow Frederick M. Hess on Twitter.

  • Email: rhess@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Sarah DuPre
    Phone: 202-862-7160
    Email: Sarah.DuPre@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image The Census Bureau and Obamacare: Dumb decision? Yes. Conspiracy? No.
image A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
image Give the CBO long-range tools
image The coming collapse of India's communists
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.