Defense jobs already being lost to sequestration

Jim Cleveland/U.S. Navy

KITTERY, Maine (Aug. 4, 2011) Shipyard workers at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard successfully undock the Los Angeles-class submarine USS San Juan (SSN 751) one day early from a routine engineered overhaul.

Article Highlights

  • Regardless of OMB and Labor Department obfuscation, many major defense companies are seriously weighing the possibility of issuing these layoff notices at some point in the next few months.

    Tweet This

  • While Washington stalls on major budget questions, businesses are acting.

    Tweet This

  • American workers are unemployed today because of the uncertainty that has been allowed to surround sequestration

    Tweet This

 

Last week, the White House’s Office of Management and Budget was required by law to report to Congress about how sequestration will be implemented. The late report may be made public today.

In the meantime, the defense industry, which employs over one million Americans, is left to guess just how badly its workers are going to be hit when sequestration takes effect in 2013. And the rumor mill is churning. I’m hearing that the White House budget guidance will be thin and largely lacking in new or substantive details.

If that’s the case, the president’s vagueness will likely be motivated by the same “concern” (read: politics) that led the Department of Labor to issue guidance on the WARN Act layoff notices to industry earlier this summer. Remember, the WARN Act requires defense companies to give 60 days notice to employees they’re planning to lay off. But the Labor Department, which has no jurisdiction over WARN Act notifications, decided it should issue a guidance memo to defense contractors telling them that they really weren’t required by law to notify employees of prospective layoffs… and especially not if those notices were going to go out the week before the election. Of course, it’s the federal courts, not Labor, that adjudicate whether employees’ rights have been violated.

Let’s review the bidding here: The law requires a report on sequestration plans and WARN Act notifications. The administration thinks both should be ignored. Both were put into place to help Americans workers and their families plan ahead or look for new opportunities and take advantage of state programs while still on payroll. Which is why, regardless of OMB and Labor Department obfuscation, many major defense companies are seriously weighing the possibility of issuing these layoff notices at some point in the next few months.

Wondering what the real impact is going to be? We get a look via Capitol Hill in this releasefrom Senators McCain (R-AZ), Ayotte (R-NH), Chambliss (R-GA), Cornyn (R-TX), Graham (R-SC), Inhofe (R-OK), and Lieberman (I-CT) detailing the damaging effects of the uncertainty surrounding the outcome of sequestration that are already underway and in a series of letters to the Hill from defense contractors.

General Dynamics, EADS, Exelis, and Lockheed Martin CEOs all made clear that contracts have slowed, and the future is too unclear to make investments or hiring decisions. The key point of their correspondence is not that layoffs are coming as a result of sequestration but that thousands of jobs are going unfilled or being lost now due to uncertainty in an already fragile economy.

While Washington stalls on major budget questions, businesses are acting. EADS Chairman and CEO Sean O’Keefe said it most succinctly: “American workers are unemployed today because of the uncertainty that has been allowed to surround sequestration.” That's today. Now imagine next year.

Mackenzie Eaglen is a resident fellow in the Marilyn Ware Center for Security Studies.

 

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Mackenzie
Eaglen
  • Mackenzie Eaglen has worked on defense issues in the U.S. Congress, both House and Senate, and at the Pentagon in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and on the Joint Staff. She specializes in defense strategy, budget, military readiness and the defense industrial base. In 2010, Ms. Eaglen served as a staff member of the congressionally mandated Quadrennial Defense Review Independent Panel, a bipartisan, blue-ribbon commission established to assess the Pentagon's major defense strategy. A prolific writer on defense related issues, she has also testified before Congress.


     


    Follow Mackenzie Eaglen on Twitter.

  • Phone: (202) 862-7183
    Email: mackenzie.eaglen@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Charles Morrison
    Phone: (202) 862-5945
    Email: charles.morrison@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image The Census Bureau and Obamacare: Dumb decision? Yes. Conspiracy? No.
image A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
image Give the CBO long-range tools
image The coming collapse of India's communists
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.