The military lost in the fiscal cliff deal

DOD/Erin Kirk-Cuomo

Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, brief the press at the Pentagon, Jan. 10, 2013. Panetta and Dempsey discussed the effects of sequestration if it were to take effect at the end of March.

Article Highlights

  • The bottom line: The fiscal cliff deal did not save the military. It may have wound up sealing its budget fate instead.

    Tweet This

  • The political dynamics of the threat of sequestration have changed dramatically in the past three months.

    Tweet This

  • Consensus is solidified that the military must absorb reductions up to and possibly beyond the amount of sequester.

    Tweet This

Headlines indicated that the new year's fiscal cliff deal was a reprieve for the U.S. military, which pushed back sequestration by two months. The reality is that the latest last minute deal did not save defense.

For starters, it was not a "punt" on sequestration but rather a down payment. And the military had to pony up a fraction of the funds as its own partial billpayer to buy more time.

In classic back-to-the-future form, Washington has established a new set of deadlines or mini cliffs for March. For the next negotiation, politicians were sure to keep sequestration alive proving that it remains a favored political hostage to fights about taxes, debt, and spending.

House Republicans have said that any increases in the debt ceiling must be matched with equal amounts of spending cuts. This means that a debt deal would require about one trillion dollars in spending cuts. As Todd Harrison of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments has pointed out, this requirement comes on top of another trillion dollars that would be needed to offset sequestration. Congress and the president have now doubled the size of the problem and therefore made it even harder to solve. 

The result is that the likelihood of sequestration has only grown. That's because the political dynamics of the threat of sequestration have changed dramatically in the past three months. While originally proposed by President Obama's staff to coerce Republicans into voting for higher taxes, the lopsided fiscal cliff deal gave the president that outcome and left the GOP wanting much more. Given that there is no Republican consensus to let America default on its bills, Speaker of the House John Boehner has indicated the most powerful leverage his party now has is to let sequestration kick in. 

As Stephen Moore writes in the Wall Street Journal, "Mr. Boehner says he has significant Republican support, including GOP defense hawks, on his side for letting the sequester do its work." 

Republicans are fully willing to shoot the sequester hostage come March. While both sides do not like the arbitrary nature of the sequester, consensus is solidified that the military must absorb reductions up to and possibly beyond the amount of sequester. 

The bottom line: The fiscal cliff deal did not save the military. It may have wound up sealing its budget fate instead.

Mackenzie Eaglen is a resident fellow at the Marilyn Ware Center for Security Studies.

 

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Mackenzie
Eaglen
  • Mackenzie Eaglen has worked on defense issues in the U.S. Congress, both House and Senate, and at the Pentagon in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and on the Joint Staff. She specializes in defense strategy, budget, military readiness and the defense industrial base. In 2010, Ms. Eaglen served as a staff member of the congressionally mandated Quadrennial Defense Review Independent Panel, a bipartisan, blue-ribbon commission established to assess the Pentagon's major defense strategy. A prolific writer on defense related issues, she has also testified before Congress.


     


    Follow Mackenzie Eaglen on Twitter.

  • Phone: (202) 862-7183
    Email: mackenzie.eaglen@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Charles Morrison
    Phone: (202) 862-5945
    Email: charles.morrison@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image Getting it right: US national security policy and al Qaeda since 2011
image Net neutrality rundown: What the NPRM means for you
image The Schuette decision
image Snatching failure from victory in Afghanistan
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Event Registration is Closed
Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

Event Registration is Closed
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.