Yes, we do have a strategy: Keep out

Reuters

President Obama gestures during a joint news conference with his Estonian counterpart Toomas Hendrik Ilves, at the Bank of Estonia in Tallinn September 3, 2014.

Article Highlights

  • We have a strategy with bipartisan support: retreat

    Tweet This

  • Hard to imagine circumstances or atrocities that will change Obama's commitment to retreat

    Tweet This

  • The "Pacific Pivot" was more a pivot away from the Middle East than to the Pacific

    Tweet This

Say what you will about Barack Obama, but his approach to the Middle East has been ruthlessly consistent.  He was elected on the promise to end America’s involvement in the post-9/11 wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  He didn’t fulfill those promises as rapidly as his supporters wished – he preferred what his advisers thought would be a “responsible” retreat rather than a full-fledged bug-out, and in Afghanistan masked his withdrawal timetable behind a temporary troop surge – but he’s made and making good on his word.  No event – not the slow-motion collapse of post-Bush Iraq, nor the many failures of governance in Afghanistan – has shifted the president from his course. Indeed, since the killing of Osama bin Laden, the pace of retreat has picked up measurably.

Beneath these strategic promises kept lies a geopolitical premise: The Middle East isn’t really that important.  This was, initially, the logic of the “Pacific pivot,” but as the last several years have made plain, the pivot was not so much to East Asia as away from the Middle East.  This isn’t an entirely ridiculous idea, at least so long as Iran stops short of fielding nuclear weapons.  After all, energy resources are fungible and the United States is fracking its way to freedom.  And though the region is full of dangers, none of the threatening actors seems strong enough to pose a serious balance-of-power challenge.

Besides, Obama & Co. don’t care much for balance-of-power politics.  That’s so 19th-century, whereas the security agenda of the 21st century will center on the environment and other “transnational” concerns.  Why worry about an Islamic State when the state is naturally withering away?

Thus, it’s hard to imagine a set of circumstances or a parade of atrocities – either qualitative, such as the beheadings of James Foley or Steven Sotloff, or quantitative, as in Syria – that forces a fundamental change on a commander-in-chief whose mind is made up. Indeed, the White House has so carefully created and nurtured the weary-of-war trope – both domestically and abroad – that all Obama has to do is chant the magic words “boots on the ground” and all argument ceases.

And so the keep-out strategy endures, embraced as fully by the opposition as President Obama.  We do have a strategy, one on which there is deep bipartisan consensus: retreat.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Thomas
Donnelly

What's new on AEI

We still don't know how many people Obamacare enrolled
image The war on invisible poverty
image Cutting fat from the budget
image Speaker of the House John Boehner on resetting America’s economic foundation
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 22
    MON
  • 23
    TUE
  • 24
    WED
  • 25
    THU
  • 26
    FRI
Monday, September 22, 2014 | 2:30 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.
Policy implications of the new US labor market normal

We welcome you to join us as a panel of economists discuss US wage and price prospects in the coming months and the implications for the Federal Reserve’s current unorthodox monetary policy.

No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.