Old wine in India's new antigraft bottle
An activist's much-vaunted political party will prove to be a damp squib.

Article Highlights

  • On Oct. 2, Arvind Kejriwal announced a new political party dedicated to ending corruption in India.

    Tweet This

  • Kejriwal’s new political party marks a milestone in the evolution of India’s recent antigraft movement.

    Tweet This

  • Kejriwal & his party represent a sorry reminder that political discourse in India remains hostage to discredited ideas.

    Tweet This

In terms of symbolism, Arvind Kejriwal could scarcely have chosen a better date to found a new political party dedicated to ending corruption in India. On Oct. 2, the birthday of Mohandas K. Gandhi, the 44-year-old activist announced to a gaggle of followers and a battery of cameras, "We declare that from today this country's public is jumping into electoral politics. Corruptors, you start counting your days!"

The as-yet unnamed party marks a milestone in the evolution of India's recent antigraft movement. These activists burst into national and international consciousness 14 months ago when the movement's iconic leader Anna Hazare went on a hunger strike to force the government to create a powerful new anticorruption ombudsman.

Now the 75-year-old Mr. Hazare has parted ways with his one-time acolyte Mr. Kejriwal over the new party, declaring, "Politics is filth." So at least in principle, the younger activist's decision to grapple with politics is superior to Mr. Hazare's vow to shun it as incurably dirty.

In practice, however, Mr. Kejriwal and his party don't represent a breath of fresh air so much as a sorry reminder that political discourse in India remains hostage to discredited ideas. The "draft vision document" he unveiled Tuesday reads like a politician's stump speech in the socialist 1970s. It shows the party is too suspicious of private initiative and too welcoming of government action.

To be fair, Mr. Kejriwal—by some accounts the brains behind the rustic Mr. Hazare's rise from an obscure regional social reformer to a national icon—retains an uncanny ability to tap into the fount of middle-class India's rage against its rulers. Many Indians would nod in agreement with Mr. Kejriwal's observation that the country's scandal-plagued political parties have become machines designed to "convert money into power and power back into more money."

Nor is his statement, that a system marked by dynastic politics and sleaze "puts off and scares the best elements of our society," easy to refute. His promise to institute intra-party elections and shun the trappings of power—cars with flashing beacons and ostentatious security details—will likely appeal to the crowds that swelled last year's anticorruption rallies.

These Indians should consider, though, how Mr. Kejriwal plans to implement his promises. In a crude echo of the civil disobedience Gandhi pioneered to fight British rule, Mr. Kejriwal has publicly called on consumers to break the law by not paying electricity bills—which are allegedly unjust. Astute observers criticized Gandhi's methods back in the 1940s as a recipe for anarchy if they continued in a democracy, and Mr. Kejriwal is bearing this out.

Then there's the party's pompously named "vision document," which rails against "the logic of capital, market mechanisms and profit motivation," and exhorts the state to "accept responsibility for full employment." The document also declares that "our development must not imitate models from outside," pandering to ultra-nationalist sentiments that echo India's autarkic past.

Mr. Kejriwal also threatened Tuesday to launch government audits against private power companies he accuses of making "heavy profits." And like virtually every other rabble-rouser, he wants the government to roll back a recent hike in fuel prices that are necessary to rein in a ballooning fiscal deficit.

In other words, Mr. Kejriwal's party, like his movement, represents a profound misreading of modern history. In his garden-variety leftist vision, India can only be rid of graft by a gargantuan new government body armed with overriding powers. He doesn't acknowledge that it's the failure to fully dismantle the infamous License Raj that breeds corruption in the first place.

India's 1991 reforms were limited in scaling back government powers, which is why the country's biggest corruption scandals today are found in areas—land, coal or telecom spectrum—that still suffer from, or have seen a rise in, government discretion. Red tape too is still abundant in India. The World Bank's annual report on the ease of doing business ranks it a dismal 132 out of 183 countries surveyed.

As importantly, the experience of the industrialized world shows that over time rising wealth and education create precisely the kind of informed citizenry less likely to tolerate blatant corruption. Mayor Michael Bloomberg's New York is a far cry from the 19th century city synonymous with the patronage of Tammany Hall. Ironically, Mr. Kejriwal's own movement, egged on by college-educated youth and a savvy electronic media, is evidence that a similar process is already under way in India.

It's true that India's middle class, long divorced from politics out of a belief that it lacked the numbers to influence outcomes, needs exactly the kind of awakening Mr. Kejriwal's anticorruption party promises. But unless India's moral fervor is yoked to an accurate understanding of what ails the country—politicians with too much say in business rather than the other way round—it could end up doing more harm than good.

Mr. Dhume is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a columnist for WSJ.com. Follow him on Twitter @dhume01

 

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Sadanand
Dhume

What's new on AEI

Love people, not pleasure
image Oval Office lacks resolve on Ukraine
image Middle East Morass: A public opinion rundown of Iraq, Iran, and more
image Verizon's Inspire Her Mind ad and the facts they didn't tell you
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Monday, July 21, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
Closing the gaps in health outcomes: Alternative paths forward

Please join us for a broader exploration of targeted interventions that provide real promise for reducing health disparities, limiting or delaying the onset of chronic health conditions, and improving the performance of the US health care system.

Monday, July 21, 2014 | 4:00 p.m. – 5:30 p.m.
Comprehending comprehensive universities

Join us for a panel discussion that seeks to comprehend the comprehensives and to determine the role these schools play in the nation’s college completion agenda.

Tuesday, July 22, 2014 | 8:50 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Who governs the Internet? A conversation on securing the multistakeholder process

Please join AEI’s Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy for a conference to address key steps we can take, as members of the global community, to maintain a free Internet.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Expanding opportunity in America: A conversation with House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan

Please join us as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) unveils a new set of policy reforms aimed at reducing poverty and increasing upward mobility throughout America.

Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 6:00 p.m. – 7:15 p.m.
Is it time to end the Export-Import Bank?

We welcome you to join us at AEI as POLITICO’s Ben White moderates a lively debate between Tim Carney, one of the bank’s fiercest critics, and Tony Fratto, one of the agency’s staunchest defenders.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.