Bush and Iraq
Letter to the Editor

Supporting the Iraqi opposition with credible force is not the same thing as encouraging an invasion of the country.

Sir, Giles Whittell seems to have misunderstood the difference between "encouraging the invasion of Iraq" and "confronting Iraq" over its support for terrorism ("Key aide defends President's role before invasion of Iraq", Nov 10).

When he asked me about policy deliberations in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, I explained that "I wasn't advocating invading Iraq and occupying Baghdad". Rather, I was arguing at that time for stopping state sponsorship of terrorism and confronting Saddam, who was praising the attacks of 9/11 and saying that Americans should "suffer" so that they would "find the right path". By then, America had already been flying combat missions for many years over northern and southern Iraq and, when attacked, firing missiles into Iraq.

I believed that there was a credible possibility that diplomacy, backed by increased support for the Iraqi opposition and a credible threat of force, might cause Saddam to abandon his support for terrorism, including sheltering Abdul Rahman Yasin (who was wanted by the FBI for making the bomb that blew up the World Trade Center in 1993), and end his defiance of a long series of UN resolutions, that had led President Clinton to sign into law the Iraq Liberation Act.

Paul Wolfowitz is a visiting scholar at AEI.
Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Paul
Wolfowitz

What's new on AEI

Study: Piketty tax plan would boost equality by making rich less rich. But poor would be poorer, too
image Rep. McCaul’s cybersecurity information sharing center: If you build it, will they come?
image Halbig and its aftermath
image Culture of how Washington pays for medical care
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 28
    MON
  • 29
    TUE
  • 30
    WED
  • 31
    THU
  • 01
    FRI
Tuesday, July 29, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Is Medicare's future secure? The 2014 Trustees Report

Please join AEI as the chief actuary for Medicare summarizes the report’s results, followed by a panel discussion of what those spending trends are likely to mean for seniors, taxpayers, the health industry, and federal policy.

Event Registration is Closed
Friday, August 01, 2014 | 10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Watergate revisited: The reforms and the reality, 40 years later

Please join us as four of Washington’s most distinguished political observers will revisit the Watergate hearings and discuss reforms that followed.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.