Obama's dithering let the Syrian situation spiral

Article Highlights

  • Republicans are right to want to restore American credibility, but shaming Obama into military action is unwise.

    Tweet This

  • Obama's voiding of his earlier red line hemorrhages US credibility.

    Tweet This

  • Diplomacy misapplied is costly.

    Tweet This

On August 20, 2012, President Barack Obama made chemical weapons use the trigger for U.S. intervention in Syria. "A red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized," he declared, adding, "That would change my calculus." With Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel's announcement that Syrian government forces used chemical munitions against Syrian rebels, many Republicans are castigating Obama for his apparent inaction.

Make no mistake: Obama's voiding of his earlier red line hemorrhages U.S. credibility and leads not only Damascus, but also Tehran and Pyongyang to conclude that America is little more than a paper tiger. Obama does harm, but he is not the only president to diminish U.S. standing with a gap between rhetoric and policy reality. George W. Bush, for example, spoke loftily of democracy and reform during his first term, but left liberals and dissidents out to dry in his second term. Nor, despite his rhetoric, was Bush's approach to Iran markedly different from that of his successor.

Republicans are right to want to restore American credibility, but shaming Obama into military action is unwise. There is a conceit in Washington that debates need never end, but ground truth shifts with time. True, Obama might have helped moderates and prevented tens of thousands of deaths had he authorized a no-fly zone and decapitating airstrikes a year and a half ago, but to ignore radicalization of the Syrian opposition in the intervening months is foolish. Groups whom American diplomats meet have little influence on the ground, where al-Qaida-affiliated radicals increasingly hold sway.

Nor is securing chemical weapons depots any longer an option: In Libya in 2003, that job took more than ten days, and that was with the government's cooperation. Leafleting to urge evacuation followed by bombing chemical weapons depots might keep the munitions away from both sides.

The real American error predates the Syrian uprising. Secretary of State Colin Powell, then-Senator John Kerry, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi each bolstered Assad with visits to Damascus. Neither their pleas nor incentives changed Assad. Like the North Koreans and Libyans, the Syrian leadership saw its American interlocutors as useful idiots, providing time and cover to augment arsenals.

Diplomacy misapplied is costly. The real opportunity to prevent murderous regimes from utilizing weapons of mass destruction occurs prior to their acquisition. Diplomacy should be tried, but only in a short and finite window.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Michael
Rubin


  • Michael Rubin is a former Pentagon official whose major research areas are the Middle East, Turkey, Iran and diplomacy. Rubin instructs senior military officers deploying to the Middle East and Afghanistan on regional politics, and teaches classes regarding Iran, terrorism, and Arab politics on board deploying U.S. aircraft carriers. Rubin has lived in post-revolution Iran, Yemen, both pre- and post-war Iraq, and spent time with the Taliban before 9/11. His newest book, Dancing with the Devil: The Perils of Engagement examines a half century of U.S. diplomacy with rogue regimes and terrorist groups.


    Follow Michael Rubin on Twitter.


  • Phone: 202-862-5851
    Email: mrubin@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Ahmad Majidyar
    Phone: 202-862-5845
    Email: ahmad.majidyar@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image The Census Bureau and Obamacare: Dumb decision? Yes. Conspiracy? No.
image A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
image Give the CBO long-range tools
image The coming collapse of India's communists
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.