Syria: No principle, no policy, no progress

Reuters

US President Obama (rear C) meets with bipartisan Congressional leaders in the Cabinet Room at the White House in Washington to discuss a military response to Syria, September 3, 2013.

Article Highlights

  • Obama, as so many have said, needs a strategy in Syria, not just a missile strike.

    Tweet This

  • “I think doing nothing will make me look bad” is neither a call to arms nor the clarion call of leadership.

    Tweet This

  • When policy and principle don’t animate decision-making, it becomes impossible to explain or predict what a leader will do.

    Tweet This

When policy and principle don’t animate decision-making, it becomes impossible to explain or predict what a leader will do. That is the world that Barack Obama has fashioned, and it’s a bloody nightmare.

Why Libya and not Syria?
Why Syria and not Benghazi?
Why go to Congress on Syria but not Libya?
Why the red line now and not after the first use of chemical weapons by Assad in April?
Why arm the rebels now but not two years ago before al Qaeda was on the scene?

Short answer: No one has any idea. Syria matters more than Libya; dying by CW is no less awful than dying from torture. The War Powers Clause doesn’t require you go to Congress before hostilities. The rebels are now less cohesive and al Qaeda groups are making inroads.

How will Congress vote? My guess is, guns to their heads, a narrow authorizing resolution passes. But don’t count on Barack Obama to help sell this to the American people. In his Saturday afternoon chat on CW and his late-night PBS interview on arming the rebels, he’s made clear this isn’t a policy he’ll defend in prime time. And if the president doesn’t care enough to sell this to the people he represents on the world stage, why should they go for it? In short, they won’t. It’s not that the facts aren’t clear, nor that the American people are not the most compassionate in the world. Nor is it that US troops will be in harm’s way, because we know they won’t be. It isn’t that Americans are — forgive the shibboleth — war weary. It’s not even sequestration. It’s that after being told for six years that the Middle East doesn’t matter, that these aren’t our fights, and that wars end on schedule, the American people are going to need to hear and see from the Commander in Chief why this is our moment to reengage. Unfortunately for our nation and for the people of Syria, “I think doing nothing will make me look bad” is neither a call to arms nor the clarion call of leadership.

Obama, as so many have said, needs a strategy in Syria, not just a missile strike. So far, no strategy is evident, no leadership is forthcoming. Ultimately, who will pay the price for this fecklessness? We will, of course. But by that time, Barack Obama will be long gone.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Danielle
Pletka

What's new on AEI

The Federal Reserve's policy dilemma
image Unemployment benefits barely soften the blow of joblessness
image Stop the US-China bilateral investment treaty talks
image US still has time to stake out a position of strength on Ukraine
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 18
    MON
  • 19
    TUE
  • 20
    WED
  • 21
    THU
  • 22
    FRI
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.