Don't ban compensation for bone-marrow donors

Article Highlights

  • Proposed bone-marrow rule would likely reduce the availability of life-saving bone-marrow transplants

    Tweet This

We write to comment on the October 2, 2013 proposal to amend 42 C.F.R. §121.13 with respect to compensation for donors of peripheral bone marrow stem cells. Because the notice of proposed rulemaking fails to offer an adequate justification for the proposed regulation, which would likely reduce the availability of life-saving bone marrow transplants, we respectfully recommend that the proposal be withdrawn.

Background

Section 301(a) of the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA), 42 U.S.C. §274e(a), enacted in 1984, prohibits the knowing acquisition, receipt, or other transfer of any “human organ” for valuable consideration for use in human transplantation if the transfer affects interstate or foreign commerce.

NOTA section 301(c)(1), 42 U.S.C. §274e(c)(1), as amended in 1988, defines “human organ” to mean “the human (including fetal) kidney, liver, heart, lung, pancreas, bone marrow, cornea, eye, bone, and skin or any subpart thereof.” The provision further states that the term also encompasses “any other human organ (or any subpart thereof, including that derived from a fetus) specified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services by regulation.”

On March 9, 2007, HHS invoked that grant of regulatory authority to adopt 42 C.F.R. §121.13. The regulation added “intestine, including the esophagus, stomach, small and/or large intestine, or any portion of the gastrointestinal tract” to the statutory definition of human organ. On July 3, 2013, HHS amended the regulation, effective July 3, 2014, to add “any vascularized composite allograft defined in §121.2” to the definition.

A unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently ruled that the term “bone marrow,” as used in NOTA section 301(c)(1), includes cells extracted from the bone marrow through aspiration (a technique that requires hospitalization and anesthesia and involves inserting large hollow needles into the cavities of the donor's hip bone), but does not include peripheral bone marrow stem cells extracted from the bloodstream through apheresis.

Under the latter technique, blood is taken from a donor's vein, filtered by an apheresis machine to collect the peripheral bone marrow stem cells, and then returned to the donor through a needle in the other arm. The donation of peripheral bone marrow stem cells through apheresis is similar to an ordinary blood donation, except that the process takes several hours and requires that medication be taken during the five days before the donation. The Ninth Circuit panel held that the peripheral bone marrow stem cells extracted from the bloodstream through apheresis are part of the blood, not part of the “bone marrow” referred to in NOTA section 301(c)(1).

The October 2, 2013 proposed regulation would amend 42 C.F.R. §121.13 by adding “other hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells without regard to the method of their collection” to the definition. In effect, the proposed regulation would overturn the Flynn decision by including peripheral bone marrow stem cells in the definition of organs for which compensation cannot be paid. In doing so, the proposed regulation would extend the scope of the prohibition on donor compensation beyond what NOTA, as authoritatively construed by the Ninth Circuit, does on its own. Because a violation of the prohibition is a criminal offense, the proposed regulation would transform conduct that is currently legal into a felony that potentially carries severe criminal penalties.

Moreover, the proposed regulation would place new obstacles in the path of the 12,000 people with cancer and blood diseases who need bone marrow transplants. Locating a marrow donor is often a needle-in-a-haystack affair. The odds that two random individuals will match are less than one in 10,000 for whites and non-blacks and much lower for blacks. Among the few who are matched after being tissue-typed via cheek swab, nearly half refuse to follow through with the actual donation. Then the hunt for another donor begins, an added delay that some patients – a number that is difficult to pin down, but which is estimated to be between 1,000 and 3,000 per year – don’t survive.

To be sure, NOTA section 301(c)(1) expressly grants HHS authority to expand the definition of human organ. But, it does not authorize HHS to do so without adequate justification. Unfortunately, the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) scarcely pretends to offer a reasoned justification for the regulatory change. The lack of reasoned justification is particularly disturbing, in view of the proposed regulation’s potential life-and-death consequences.

Don't ban compensation for bone marrow donors

Download PDF

 

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Sally
Satel

 

Alan D.
Viard

What's new on AEI

Expanding opportunity in America
image Moving beyond fear: Addressing the threat of the Islamic state in Iraq and Syria
image Foreign policy is not a 'CSI' episode
image The Air Force’s vital role
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Monday, July 21, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
Closing the gaps in health outcomes: Alternative paths forward

Please join us for a broader exploration of targeted interventions that provide real promise for reducing health disparities, limiting or delaying the onset of chronic health conditions, and improving the performance of the US health care system.

Monday, July 21, 2014 | 4:00 p.m. – 5:30 p.m.
Comprehending comprehensive universities

Join us for a panel discussion that seeks to comprehend the comprehensives and to determine the role these schools play in the nation’s college completion agenda.

Tuesday, July 22, 2014 | 8:50 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Who governs the Internet? A conversation on securing the multistakeholder process

Please join AEI’s Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy for a conference to address key steps we can take, as members of the global community, to maintain a free Internet.

Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Expanding opportunity in America: A conversation with House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan

Please join us as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) unveils a new set of policy reforms aimed at reducing poverty and increasing upward mobility throughout America.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 6:00 p.m. – 7:15 p.m.
Is it time to end the Export-Import Bank?

We welcome you to join us at AEI as POLITICO’s Ben White moderates a lively debate between Tim Carney, one of the bank’s fiercest critics, and Tony Fratto, one of the agency’s staunchest defenders.

Event Registration is Closed
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.