Marty Samuels is right: Clinicians should focus on patient, not society

The lead story in today’s New York Times brings to the fore an emerging question in medicine: when providing care and offering advice, should a physician think only of the patient in front of her, or does she have an obligation to balance the needs of the individual patient with the broader needs of society?

I strongly agree with Harvard neurologist Marty Samuels, who told the NYT, “There should be forces in society who should be concerned about the budget, about how many M.R.I.s we do, but they shouldn’t be functioning simultaneously as doctors."

Added the Times, “Samuels  said doctors risked losing the trust of patients if they told patients, ‘I’m not going to do what I think is best for you because I think it’s bad for the health care budget in Massachusetts.’”

It seems absolutely essential to me that when a patient receives advice from a physician, the patient knows that this reflects the best medical advice from the doctor, and not some murky weighing of whether the patient is more deserving than society.

This prioritization of the individual patient  is consistent with a desire for cost transparency (cost can matter a lot to patients), and with physicians understanding and being able to explain the costs and potential benefits of a range of treatment options (to the extent multiple options are available — sadly, this often is not the case).  (Addendum: as Ashish Jha more eloquently phrased this point, “Should MDs consider costs as it affects their patients? Yes!  How about how $ affect society? Not clear.” [In the case of the treating physician, I'm arguing "no."])

The foundation of the physician-patient relationship, the bedrock of care, is, should, and must be the unshakable trust the patient has that his doctor will do what’s best for him.  Once this faith is breached, it may never be restored, to the permanent detriment of both patients and the profession of medicine.

At that point, physicians will truly transform into the bureaucrats and bean counters they’ve struggled so valiantly not to become.

- – - -

I’ve discussed a number of key issues related to patients and populations extensively before, in three related contexts: (1) Should clinicians focus on patients or populations? (2) End of life (or not) decisions; (3) Balancing patient and population benefit in medical research.  See related links below:

Should Doctors Focus On Patients Or Populations:

Focus Factor: Should Your Doctor Be Thinking About Society’s Healthcare Costs?”

Case Study: What Would You Do Here If You Were The Payor? The Doctor? The Patient?”

Do No Harm – To Patients Or To Populations?”

On End Of Life (or not) Decisions:

Right to Live

End-Of-Life Medical Advice: Devaluing Patients In The Name Of A Greater Good

’But Doctor, I Want To Live!’  The Other Side Of The ‘Dignified Death’ Debate

Balancing Patient and Population Benefit In Medical Research:

A Future We Make For Ourselves: Should We Expand Imperfect Treatments, Or Create New Ones?”

Preserving American (Medical) Exceptionalism

Medicine by Metrics

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

David
Shaywitz

What's new on AEI

Making Ryan's tax plan smarter
image The teacher evaluation confronts the future
image How to reform the US immigration system
image Inversion hysteria
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 01
    MON
  • 02
    TUE
  • 03
    WED
  • 04
    THU
  • 05
    FRI
Wednesday, September 03, 2014 | 9:00 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.
From anarchy to Augustus: Lessons on dealing with disorder, from Rome’s first emperor

We invite you to join us for two panel discussions on how Augustus created order from chaos 2,000 years ago, and what makes for durable domestic and international political systems in the 21st century.

Event Registration is Closed
Wednesday, September 03, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Multiple choice: Expanding opportunity through innovation in K–12 education

Please join us for a book launch event and panel discussion about how a marketplace of education options can help today's students succeed in tomorrow's economy. Attendees will receive a complimentary copy of the featured book.

Thursday, September 04, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
How conservatives can save the safety net

Please join us for a luncheon event in which our panel will discuss what conservatives can learn from how liberals talk and think about the safety net and where free-market economics, federalism, and social responsibility intersect to lift people out of poverty.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.