Will (should) incremental biopharma innovation survive the reimbursement apocalypse?

Pharmaceuticals by Shutterstock.com

Five to ten years.  That's how long it will be before drug reimbursement in the United States becomes as stringent as in Europe, according to a range of consultants, analysts, and health policy experts with whom I've spoken.

This new reimbursement environment - and the expectations leading up to it - is expected to emphasize the value of "profound" innovation, at the expense of less dramatic, incremental innovation.

The pharmaceutical innovations most stakeholders seem to want - from payors to clinicians (see this thoughtful analysis from Avorn and Kesselheim) - are either improvements in efficacy or new mechanisms (which are often presumed, at least initially, to offer significant new options for patients).

There's also seems to be an evolving sense that such innovation is possible.  A palpable excitement surrounds the recent advances in cancer immunotherapy, for example - real conviction that revolutionary, impactful therapeutics will emerge from this area.

U.S. regulators, for their part, have clearly signaled their interest in accelerating just this sort of "important" innovation.  Patients, too, follow research advances with increasing sophistication, and will often flock to studies of especially promising new therapeutics, enabling unusually rapid recruitment, often a limiting factor in clinical studies.

Where will this leave incremental innovation?  There's no question that it will become more challenging and more expensive, since there will be far more pressure to demonstrate measurable improvement over previous products.

But it may also be premature to write off incremental innovation in biopharma.

  • The relatively low technical risk (compared to targeting a novel mechanism) will remain attractive and compelling.
  • The measurement technologies of digital health (as I've suggested) may help provide evidence for meaningful differentiation.
  • U.S. patients and physicians may demand and continue to support the development of continuously improved products.  Many stakeholders recognize that while small improvements (e.g. in tolerability and safety) are often systematically undervalued, they can have a huge impact over time.  Examples include the evolution of HIV therapy, or (as Darshak Sanghavi has argued in Slate) advances in pediatric oncology.
  • The market opportunity for incrementally improved products may turn out to be relatively undervalued.  Forecasting (as I've noted) is a dark art, and the reimbursement environment in the U.S. may evolve less rapidly than predicted, or arrive at a less restrictive end-state than most anticipate.

 

The hope is that as the U.S. healthcare system lurches forward, rebalanced incentives will stimulate investment in high-risk projects and enterprises, while preserving the unsexy but important incremental improvements upon which medical advancement depends.  The worry is that without just the right balance, we risk cutting off an important path to progress.

 

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

David
Shaywitz
  • Dr. Shaywitz trained in internal medicine and endocrinology at MGH, and conducted his post-doctoral research in the Melton lab at Harvard. He gained experience in early clinical drug development in the Department of Experimental Medicine at Merck, then joined the Boston Consulting Group’s Healthcare and Corporate Development practices, where he focused on strategy and organizational design. He is currently Director of Strategic and Commercial Planning at Theravance, a publicly-held drug development company in South San Francisco. He recently wrote Tech Tonics: Can Passionate Entreprenuers Heal Healthcare With Technology? 

  • Email: davidshaywitz.aei@gmail.com

What's new on AEI

image The money in banking: Comparing salaries of bank and bank regulatory employees
image What Obama should say about China in Japan
image A key to college success: Involved dads
image China takes the fight to space
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.