The Inverted Federalism of Grider v. Compaq

Resident Fellow
Ted Frank

In Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, the U.S. Supreme Court held that due process prohibits a state from imposing its law extraterritorially upon transactions with no connection to the state.[1] A 2003 decision in Oklahoma, however, does just that, creating fifty state classes under choice-of-law principles, even though the Oklahoma legislature would be forbidden from doing so.[2] A recent unreported Oklahoma case, Grider v. Compaq Computer Corp., applies Texas consumer law on a nationwide basis--even as the Texas Supreme Court has held that such law is inapplicable outside of Texas.[3] Grider's class certification raises troubling questions of due process, the Full Faith and Credit Clause, and public policy. . . .

Click here to view the full text of this article as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

Notes

1. 472 U.S. 797 (1985).
2. Ysbrand v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 81 P.3d 618 (Okla. 2003).
3. Unreported decision from Oklahoma, cert. denied, 128 S.Ct. 378
(2007).

About the Author

 

Ted
Frank
  • Ted Frank is a former resident fellow at AEI. He specialized in product liability, class actions, and civil procedure while at AEI. Before joining AEI, Mr. Frank was a litigator from 1995 to 2005 and clerked for the Honorable Frank H. Easterbrook on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Mr. Frank has written for law reviews, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, and The American Spectator and has testified before Congress multiple times on legal issues. He writes for the award-winning legal blogs PointOfLaw.com and Overlawyered, and the Wall Street Journal has called him a "leading tort-reform advocate."  Mr. Frank was recently elected to membership in the American Law Institute.
AEI on Facebook