Supreme Court's VRA decision a win for our system of government

Reuters

Article Highlights

  • Our nation’s laws must apply uniformly to each state and jurisdiction.

    Tweet This

  • The #SCOTUS decision in Shelby County v. Holder restores an important constitutional order to US government.

    Tweet This

  • In the 5 decades since its passage, amendments and legal developments transformed the VRA into muddled legislation.

    Tweet This

  • The #SCOTUS opinion is a great testament to the character of the American people.

    Tweet This

Our nation’s laws must apply uniformly to each state and jurisdiction. Tuesday’s 5-4 decision by the Supreme Court striking down Section 4 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act (VRA) restores an important constitutional order to our system of government, which entitles all 50 states to equal dignity and sovereignty.

Born from bloodshed in March 1965, when 600 black protesters marching for the right to vote in Selma, Ala., were set upon by state troopers wielding clubs and tear gas, the VRA was, as President Lyndon B. Johnson declared at the time of its passage, “a triumph for freedom as huge as any victory that has ever been known on the battlefield.”

The act was created to prevent voting discrimination. Unfortunately, in the almost five decades since its passage, amendments and legal developments have transformed this once-simple law into muddled and contradictory legislation. Since then, the VRA, now far removed from its original purpose of ensuring voting rights for millions of African Americans, had become a costly, pernicious tool for gerrymandering and incumbent protection.

Section 4 of the VRA had been used to determine which state and local governments would have to comply with Section 5, which required the specified state and local governments to get approval from the U.S. Justice Department before changing voting laws or procedures. Even though Tuesday’s decision allows Section 5 to survive, it has been rendered powerless now that Section 4 has been struck down.

Shelby County, Ala., challenged the VRA in 2010, arguing that Congress’s failure to modernize the law in light of the enormous improvements in minority electoral opportunities in the areas covered by Section 4 rendered it unconstitutional.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that there are no meaningful differences in minority voting opportunities between the covered and non-covered jurisdictions. These days, we routinely see African Americans and Hispanics win elections in white-majority districts in states such as Texas, Georgia, Alabama and South Carolina, to name a few.

The Supreme Court’s opinion is also a great testament to the character of the American people, who have labored to fulfill the guarantee of racial equality in voting. The American South long ago laid down the burdens of minority disfranchisement and has integrated African Americans fully into its political life. If Congress finds factual data that shows that disenfranchisement of minorities is occurring in places throughout the country, it can and should create new directives to deal with the disenfranchisement.

As Frank C. Ellis, Jr., the county attorney for Shelby County, said after the decision was released, “The justices correctly acknowledged that the covered jurisdictions should no longer be punished by the federal government for conditions that existed over 40 years ago. The South is an altogether different place than it was in 1965.” That is something that all Americans can celebrate.

Edward Blum, an American Enterprise Institute visiting fellow, is the author of The Unintended Consequences of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act (2007). He also directs the Project on Fair Representation, a not-for-profit legal defense foundation based in Alexandria, Virginia, which provided counsel to Shelby County.


Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Edward
Blum
  • Edward Blum is also the director of the Project on Fair Representation. He studies civil rights policy issues such as voting rights, affirmative action, and multiculturalism. Prior to joining AEI, he facilitated the legal challenge to dozens of racially gerrymandered voting districts and race-based school admissions and public contracting programs throughout the nation. He is the author of The Unintended Consequences of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act (AEI Press, 2007). The book describes how in recent years the Voting Rights Act has caused minority voters to become pawns in partisan redistricting battles, diminished competitive elections, driven the creation of bug-splat-like voting districts, and contributed to the ideological polarization of voting districts.
  • Phone: 7035051922
    Email: eblum@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Neil McCray
    Phone: 2028625826
    Email: neil.mccray@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image The money in banking: Comparing salaries of bank and bank regulatory employees
image What Obama should say about China in Japan
image A key to college success: Involved dads
image China takes the fight to space
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.