Ballots, not judges, will decide this
Letter to the Editor

Wikimedia Commons

Article Highlights

  • Opponents of the individual mandate will have to win their fight in November 2012

    Tweet This

  • Too many judges have broadened the scope of the Commerce and Necessary and Proper Clauses

    Tweet This

Regarding your editorial "Judge Sutton's Imaginary Mandate" (July 5): Constitutional challenges to the individual mandate face steeper legal hurdles than just the "as applied" versus "facial" challenge distinction raised by Judge Jeffrey Sutton in the Sixth Circuit appellate opinion. There remains a long line of unfortunate and flawed Supreme Court precedents regarding the broad scope of the powers granted to Congress under both the Commerce Clause (a de minimus level for activities to "substantially affect" interstate commerce) and the Necessary and Proper Clause (bootstraps supplied by regulatory schemes). Several current "judicial restraint" conservative Justices--John Roberts, Samuel Alito and Antonin Scalia--were complicit in at least one recent expansive interpretation (Gonzales v. Raich, U.S. v. Comstock) of federal regulatory power. The trio also remain reluctant to launch a new round of indeterminate interpretations of constitutional clauses, based on fine distinctions such as those between "activity" and "inactivity," that would be hard to enforce consistently.

Judge Sutton may have feigned powerlessness as a mere federal appellate judge to help chart a clearer direction in muddled High Court jurisprudence, and he overstated the review standard for a law that the last congressional majority was hard pressed to pass with a straight face.

A more fruitful line of challenge to the mandate will involve whether its sweeping assertion of national regulation remains "proper" within the constitutional structure of power between the federal and state governments. Nevertheless, it remains most likely that opponents of the individual mandate and the other interwoven abuses of the Affordable Care Act will have to win this fight "old school" at the ballot box in November 2012.

Thomas P. Miller is a resident fellow at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Thomas P.
Miller

What's new on AEI

With Ukraine, Putin is courting the home crowd
image Ayn Rand vs. Paul Ryan
image Fighting for us: The real stakes in Israel’s war
image Obama failed to stop the Islamic State when he had the chance
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 28
    MON
  • 29
    TUE
  • 30
    WED
  • 31
    THU
  • 01
    FRI
Tuesday, July 29, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Is Medicare's future secure? The 2014 Trustees Report

Please join AEI as the chief actuary for Medicare summarizes the report’s results, followed by a panel discussion of what those spending trends are likely to mean for seniors, taxpayers, the health industry, and federal policy.

Friday, August 01, 2014 | 10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Watergate revisited: The reforms and the reality, 40 years later

Please join us as four of Washington’s most distinguished political observers will revisit the Watergate hearings and discuss reforms that followed.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.