Why Don't Poor Countries Choose Capitalism?

Countries such as Singapore, South Korea, and Chile have enjoyed enormous success by embracing capitalism and developing their economies. But while capitalism may open the way for democracy, it has not always proved possible to create free markets under universal suffrage. Electorates that are not dominated by a property-owning middle class are often swayed by populist agendas, which emphasize state control rather than liberal reforms. Corrupt states are often to blame for sluggish growth, so why do electorates in such nations put their trust in them? Why does the presence of corruption heighten the electoral appeal of socialism rather than free enterprise?

Harvard economist Rafael Di Tella, who has just published a paper on these questions, will present his findings at this event. William Easterly of New York University will respond, and AEI’s Henry Wendt Scholar in Political Economy, Nicholas Eberstadt, will moderate.

About the Author

 

Nicholas
Eberstadt
  • Nicholas Eberstadt, a political economist and a demographer by training, is also a senior adviser to the National Board of Asian Research, a member of the visiting committee at the Harvard School of Public Health, and a member of the Global Leadership Council at the World Economic Forum. He researches and writes extensively on economic development, foreign aid, global health, demographics, and poverty. He is the author of numerous monographs and articles on North and South Korea, East Asia, and countries of the former Soviet Union. His books range from The End of North Korea (AEI Press, 1999) to The Poverty of the Poverty Rate (AEI Press, 2008).

     

  • Phone: 202-862-5825
    Email: eberstadt@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Kelly Matush
    Phone: 202-862-5835
    Email: kelly.matush@aei.org
AEI on Facebook