Iraq Movie "Curse" Is a Myth Worthy of Hollywood

Senior Fellow Kevin A. Hassett
Senior Fellow
Kevin A. Hassett
The Robert Redford movie Lions for Lambs has been a box-office disappointment. It grossed $6.7 million during its first weekend earlier this month, placing it fourth behind Bee Movie ($25.6 million), American Gangster ($24 million) and Fred Claus ($18.5 million).

It is not ordinarily big news when a movie does poorly. Indeed, the Redford film has been savaged by critics, which makes its paltry ticket sales even less of a surprise. Still, its weakness at the box office has been the focus of attention. On Nov. 6, USA Today published an article, "Movie Fans Vote 'No' on Politically Charged Films." Three days later, Agence France-Presse released a widely distributed piece, "Hollywood is Casualty of War as Movie-Goers Shun Iraq Films."

The best art reveals hidden truths about ourselves. In this episode, the irony is that the media response to a flop has revealed much about the world we live in, perhaps more effectively than would a cinema masterpiece.

It might be interesting and noteworthy if movies about Iraq were suffering at the box office. The problem is they aren't.

The fact that moviegoers are avoiding Lions for Lambs is interesting to the media because it supports one of the key liberal narratives of our times: Citizens are sick and tired of the Iraq war; they blame an unpopular president and his party for the horrible mess we are in; and they're so repulsed that they can't even bring themselves to watch films about the war or war-related themes.

This contrasts with Americans' attitude toward movies about other U.S. wars. They flocked to see Apocalypse Now and The Deer Hunter, despite the unpopularity of the Vietnam War. If they don't go see movies about Iraq, then this war, in a way, must be worse than Vietnam.

Simple Plots, Please

If the world is going to be a stage, then it needs to have a simple plot. Conservatives have long complained that stories and data are publicized most when they support the accepted story line. Facts inconsistent with liberal orthodoxy have a difficult time working their way into the popular consciousness. This means good news about the progress currently being made in Iraq is buried. And it even affects the way the media covers something as apparently trivial as movie ticket sales.

It might be interesting and noteworthy if movies about Iraq were suffering at the box office. The problem is they aren't. The data suggest that these movies do just about as well, on average, as other films.

I base this conclusion on information gathered from the Numbers, a Web site that offers an assortment of movie data, including ratings, genre, tickets sold and budgets.

Deceptive Numbers

There, I was able to obtain data on 2,138 movies released in the U.S. from Jan. 1, 2004, to Oct. 26, 2007. Of those, 17 dealt directly with the war or issues relating to it, such as torture and the treatment of prisoners, according to the Internet Movie Database. Some of these titles include Fahrenheit 9/11, In the Valley of Elah and Rendition.

The top-line numbers suggest there is something to the hypothesis about an "Iraq curse" at the cinema. During this period, the average number of tickets sold for each movie was about 2.52 million, generating average inflation-adjusted revenue per film of $16.5 million. For "Iraq" movies, average ticket sales were 2.24 million tickets, generating inflation-adjusted revenue of $14.7 million.

The top-line numbers, however, aren't the whole story. Iraq movies differed from typical films in that they were much more likely to have an "R" rating or to be unrated. Only three of the 17 films had a rating of "PG-13"or lower.

The Trouble With 'R'

Ratings have a huge effect on sales; an R designation essentially disqualifies a large percentage of the potential audience from attending because it requires that children under the age of 17 be accompanied by a parent.

As a result, according to this data, PG-13 movies generate on average more than double the revenue of movies rated R. Controlling for ratings differences with a statistical regression, movies that deal with the war actually generated slightly more revenue per film than those that focused on other subjects.

Thus, to say that Iraq-related movies are wildly unpopular is incorrect. Iraq films don't seem to have much of a different record than the competition.

What does it mean if movies about Iraq are as popular as any other films? Probably that Americans have a complex relationship with the war and are willing to consume entertainment that confronts them with evidence or viewpoints that can inform their thinking.

Turning Around

The war has been, after all, terribly mismanaged. Yet it seems to be turning around. Many good men and women have paid a terrible price for the conflict, but many bad men have met justice. We want it to end, but worry about the consequences of retreat. Any rational human being would have complex emotions about such a circumstance, and talented artists and performers can help viewers navigate those emotions.

Unlike the Vietnam War, the fighting in Iraq isn't over. Voters' attitudes toward the conflict may determine its outcome. That is why hoaxes such as the Iraq war movie curse are in ready supply, and why it's so important to expose them.

Kevin A. Hassett is a senior fellow and director of economic policy studies at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Kevin A.
Hassett
  • Before joining AEI, Mr. Hassett was a senior economist at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and an associate professor of economics and finance at the Graduate School of Business of Columbia University, as well as a policy consultant to the Treasury Department during the George H. W. Bush and Clinton administrations. He served as an economic adviser to the George W. Bush 2004 presidential campaign, chief economic adviser to Senator John McCain during the 2000 presidential primaries, senior economic adviser to the McCain 2008 presidential campaign, and economic adviser to the Mitt Romney 2012 presidential campaign.   Mr. Hassett is a columnist for National Review.

  • Phone: 202-862-7157
    Email: khassett@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Emma Bennett
    Phone: 202-862-5862
    Email: emma.bennett@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image Swearing in the enemy
image Syria and American strategy
image Commencement speakers: Conservatives need not apply
image The literary profession and civic culture
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 20
    MON
  • 21
    TUE
  • 22
    WED
  • 23
    THU
  • 24
    FRI
Tuesday, May 21, 2013 | 5:00 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.
Free beer: Liberating libations from ‘Bootleggers and Baptists’

Join us for a discussion of the history and future of federal and state alcohol regulation and competition, followed by a reception with beer, wine, and spirits.

Wednesday, May 22, 2013 | 5:00 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.
NCLB sanctions: Tests taken, lessons learned

Join education scholars and practitioners for a discussion about the latest NCLB research and its implications for future education policy.

Thursday, May 23, 2013 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Competing visions of the common good: Rethinking help for the poor

What shared commitments do we have as citizens and neighbors to care for one another? How can a proper ordering of America’s political economy enable the most people to have the best life? At this event, Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA), a longtime champion of human rights causes, and AEI President Arthur Brooks will join Wallis in addressing these and other questions.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.