Genetic Goldmine

Adjunct Fellow Jon Entine
Adjunct Fellow
Jon Entine

Jews are a genetic goldmine. No one wants to resurrect the pre-genetic notion of race in which people were ranked by characteristics. But in order to offer invaluable insights into the origins of disease, scientists are committed to studying distinctive populations based on geography (Icelanders), cultures (gypsies), or religions (Amish).

Since the founding of Ashkenazi Jewry until recent decades, despite being scattered to winds of the world, the rate of non-Jewish lineages that have slipped into the Jewish gene pool, per generation, is estimated at 0.5%. Disease genes spread throughout the Jewish world and have stayed there.

In the late 1960s, when my aunt, grandmother, and mother died of breast or ovarian cancers, our family believed these were tragic coincidences. But when my sister discovered a lump in her breast five years ago and diagnosed with breast cancer, a genetic test discovered a variation of the BRCA2 gene, one of three forms of this cancer that target Jews almost exclusively. While the general female population faces a 10% possibility of developing breast or ovarian cancer, the lifetime risk with one of these mutations may rise to 80%. Most geneticists believe that these three mutations trace to Jews who lived 1,000 or more years ago when European Jewry numbered less than 25,000 people. As Ashkenazi Jews passed through a "population bottleneck" and their numbers began to explode, these genes spread quickly. They became, along with cultural signatures such as devotion to the Torah and Talmud, markers of being Jewish.

Three scientists have offered a fascinating and scientifically testable theory suggesting that Jews may be compensated by nature for suffering diseases because the genes that partly cause them are linked directly or indirectly to intelligence.

I was tested and found out that I carry the BRCA2 mutation, and my nine-year-old daughter, the product of a mixed marriage, has a 50/50 chance of being a carrier. It's difficult to trace this wayward gene as my family tree disappears into the fog of the 19th century diaspora. The only thing scientists can say for certain is that, like some 40-odd other genetic disorders that are common among Jews, this cancer is a tragic symbol of our shared ancestry.

While the first sketch of the human genome, unveiled in 2001, underscored that humans are more alike than different, the sequencing of the entire genome has ushered in a more precarious era. Geneticists are identifying chunks of DNA, known as haplotypes, and the results of their research stretches the limits of acceptable public discourse.

HapMaps suggest that humanity is better understood as a collection of overlapping but identifiable populations that, remarkably, mirror traditional racial and ethnic groupings. Genetic blocks linked to human characteristics, including body type, behavior, skill sets, and brain architecture, vary among ancestral populations.

Harmful mutated genes usually disappear because people who carry them die at earlier ages or have difficulty finding mates. Why haven't the deadliest genes passed out of the Jewish gene pool, eradicated by natural selection?

Three scientists--Henry Harpending and Jason Hardy of the University of Utah and Gregory Cochran--have offered a fascinating and scientifically testable theory suggesting that Jews may be compensated by nature for suffering diseases because the genes that partly cause them are linked directly or indirectly to intelligence.

These scientists, all Christians, were intrigued by the remarkable success of Jews--insert Jewish doctor or lawyer joke here--and their startlingly high scores on IQ tests, which almost all scientists believe are heavily influenced by genetics. Ashkenazi Jews average between 107 and 115, significantly higher than the world average of 100.

Messrs. Harpending, Hardy, and Cochran identified 19 "Jewish diseases," including Tay Sachs, Gaucher, and breast cancer, that affect the enzyme pathways which influence neurological and brain development. They suggest that single variations of a disease gene may juice the brain while two may cause a crippling disease. And like a feedback loop, Jewish nurture may have reinforced Jewish nature.

For hundreds of years, the smartest, most literate male Jews--the rabbis and moneylenders--mated with the wealthiest and wisest daughters, ensuring the spread of "smart genes," due to arranged marriages. Parsing the Talmud paid off. In other words, the scientists suggest, potentially harmful mutations may persist in the Jewish gene pool because their possibility of causing cancer is trumped by their greater likelihood of promoting high intelligence. I discussed this thesis with dozens of geneticists. Not one dismissed it outright, but only a handful would go on the record. Suggesting that behavioral characteristics are genetic and distributed unevenly across populations can put careers in jeopardy. Finding links between Judaism and DNA, even flattering hints of genetically-shaped high IQ, is particularly unnerving considering the lessons of Jewish history.

Yet we can't escape the fact that Judaism is different from Christianity or Islam. It's not purely faith-based. It originated as a tribal religion, tied to nationhood. It remains a rich tapestry with threads of faith, land, and blood ancestry--a genetic as well as a cultural inheritance.

We don't fully understand how differences in disease proclivities, behaviors, and the brain have evolved. The great paradox of biodiversity research is that the only way to understand how similar humans are is to learn how we differ.

Jon Entine is an adjunct fellow at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Jon
Entine
  • Jon Entine, a former Emmy-winning producer for NBC News and ABC News, researches and writes about corporate responsibility and science and society. His books include No Crime But Prejudice: Fischer Homes, the Immigration Fiasco, and Extra-Judicial Prosecution (TFG Books, May 2009), about prosecutorial excesses; Abraham's Children: Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People (Grand Central Publishing, 2007), which focuses on the genetics of race; Let Them Eat Precaution: How Politics Is Undermining the Genetic Revolution in Agriculture (AEI Press, 2006), about the genetic modification of food and farming; Pension Fund Politics: The Dangers of Socially Responsible Investing (AEI Press, 2005), which reveals the effects of social investing on pension funds; and the best-selling Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports and Why We're Afraid to Talk about It (Public Affairs, 2000), based on an award-winning NBC News documentary. Currently, Mr. Entine is an adviser to Global Governance Watch (GGW), a project that examines transparency and accountability issues at the United Nations (UN), in nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and in related international organizations. GGW also analyzes the impact of UN agencies and NGOs on government and corporations. He is also working on a book exploring the revolutionary impact of genomic research on medical treatments and traditional perceptions of human limits and capabilities.
  • Phone: 513-319-8388
    Email: jentine@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image How to beat Memorial Day traffic forever
image Bernanke stumbles, markets react
image Don't edit the First Amendment
image Home Economics
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 27
    MON
  • 28
    TUE
  • 29
    WED
  • 30
    THU
  • 31
    FRI
Wednesday, May 29, 2013 | 4:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.
Solar radiation management: An evolving climate policy option

As the controversy over climate policy has grown, it has been said that greenhouse gas (GHG) control is too hard but solar radiation management (SRM) is too easy. Join AEI for a discussion of the potential economic benefits, as well as the risks of SRM with Lee Lane, J. Eric Bickel and Nobel Laureate Thomas Schelling. A reception will follow.

Thursday, May 30, 2013 | 12:00 p.m. – 2:15 p.m.
Public employee pensions: How large are the deficits? What changes can be made?

At this event, panelists will address pension reform challenges by presenting the results of three research papers commissioned by AEI through a generous grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation.

Friday, May 31, 2013 | 9:15 a.m. – 11:15 a.m.
Long-term care: Markets or mandates?

Mark Warshawsky, a well-known expert in retirement finance and a newly appointed commissioner, will explain the implications of a publicly funded long-term care insurance program. Then a panel will debate whether another government program the best way to ensure that families can afford to provide the necessary services for their aging loved ones.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.