Do money market funds create systemic risk?

Video

Post Event Summary
Since a run on the Reserve Primary Fund during the financial crisis in 2008, the Financial Stability Oversight Council has suggested that some money market funds (MMF) threaten the stability of the U.S. financial system and place them—along with other large financial firms—under Federal Reserve supervision and regulation. On Thursday at AEI, Melanie Fein of Fein Law Office presented a paper defending MMFs from the prospect of increased regulation.

In her keynote address, Fein articulated why the transparency, lack of leverage, present regulation and strict liquidity requirements make MMFs substantially safe products in the financial system. Jeffrey Gordon of Columbia University disputed some of the paper's claims, however, emphasizing the two-sided run problem of MMFs that lack first-loss protection.

Ed Greene of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton then placed MMFs in the broader context of shadow banking, still noting that unnecessary regulation would significantly harm the market for such funds. Investment Company Suite’s Paul Stevens concluded the discussion by asserting that regulators are perhaps overestimating the risks toward MMFs, which are among the most transparent products in the financial system.
-James Pickens

Event Description
Following the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in September 2008, one primary money market fund (MMF) "broke the buck" and set off a run on other similar funds. The U.S. Treasury temporarily insured MMFs to stem redemptions. In January 2010, the SEC changed the regulations governing MMFs to provide for more liquidity and disclosure of the potential risks associated with MMF investments.

Still, recent speeches by Federal Reserve officials have suggested more needs to be done and carried the veiled threat that, if the SEC does not take the necessary actions, the Financial Stability Oversight Council may find that some funds threaten the stability of the U.S. financial system and place them, along with other large financial firms, under Fed supervision and regulation. This discussion will consider whether MMFs require some capital backing and are suitable candidates for SIFI treatment.

Full video will be posted within 24 hours.

 

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Peter J.
Wallison

What's new on AEI

AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters
image A nation divided by marriage
image Teaching reform
image Socialist party pushing $20 minimum wage defends $13-an-hour job listing
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 20
    MON
  • 21
    TUE
  • 22
    WED
  • 23
    THU
  • 24
    FRI
Monday, October 20, 2014 | 2:00 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Warfare beneath the waves: The undersea domain in Asia

We welcome you to join us for a panel discussion of the undersea military competition occurring in Asia and what it means for the United States and its allies.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014 | 8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters

AEI’s Election Watch is back! Please join us for two sessions of the longest-running election program in Washington, DC. 

Wednesday, October 22, 2014 | 1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.
What now for the Common Core?

We welcome you to join us at AEI for a discussion of what’s next for the Common Core.

Thursday, October 23, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.
Brazil’s presidential election: Real challenges, real choices

Please join AEI for a discussion examining each candidate’s platform and prospects for victory and the impact that a possible shift toward free-market policies in Brazil might have on South America as a whole.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.