-
-
Email Event
-
-
Roger Noll, emeritus professor of economics at Stanford University, will deliver the 2006 AEI-Brookings Joint Center Distinguished Lecture on why regulatory reform has stalled and why certain costly regulatory practices are spreading to the rest of the world. He will discuss how politics can block beneficial reforms of regulations that
Listen to Audio
play
pause
Download Audio as MP3
do little more than protect incumbents and prevent competition. He will also examine why so many countries ignore the costs of suppressing competition and, instead, create regulated monopolies when privatizing state-owned enterprises.
| 5:00 p.m. | Registration | |
| | | |
| 5:15 | Welcome: | Christopher DeMuth, American Enterprise Institute |
| | | |
| | Introduction: | Robert Hahn, AEI-Brookings Joint Center |
| | | |
| | Lecture: | Roger Noll, Stanford University |
| | | |
| 6:30 | Wine and Cheese Reception | |
| | | |
| 7:00 | Adjournment | |
November 2006
Roger Noll, emeritus professor of economics at Stanford University, delivered the 2006 AEI-Brookings Joint Center Distinguished Lecture on November 14 concerning regulatory reform and practices. He discussed the accomplishments of regulatory economists and their efforts to sketch a vision for the future, while observing the spread of current American reform efforts to other economies abroad.
Roger Noll
Stanford University
Regulatory reform is a slow process most of the time, and reformers should be patient. Economists, in particular, have contributed greatly to the improvement of regulatory policy not just in the United States but also throughout the world.
By the late 1970s, economists had persuasively demonstrated the inefficiencies of regulating key markets, such as transportation. This led to the deregulation of various industries in the United States, including airlines, trucking, and some financial services. Countries around the world took note of American efficiency gains in these areas and eventually followed suit, privatizing many state-owned enterprises.
Economists’ contribution to regulatory reform went beyond documenting the gains from deregulation of selected industries. They also helped with the development of new pricing methods, such as price caps, to balance equity and efficiency; the refinement and implementation of cost-benefit analysis; the design of Federal Communications Commission spectrum auctions, which solved the complicated problem of efficiently allocating spectrum; and the introduction of emissions trading markets, a more efficient means of pollution reduction.
Regulatory economists’ work, however, is far from complete, and their attention should be concentrated in two new areas: international trade and regulatory impact analysis. Regulatory economists have not yet scrutinized a litany of rules governing international trade. They should expand the domain of regulatory impact analysis. Currently, this analysis is mandated for executive rulemaking agencies, but other agencies still implement rules without a careful consideration of their economic impacts.
Joint Center research assistant David Burk prepared this summary.
