Back from Baghdad: Views from Veterans of the Iraq Mission
About This Event

Ground experience in Iraq is substantially changing the political debate over the Iraq war. In the U.S. presidential race, Senator John McCain, who made his eighth trip to Iraq in March 2008, states that his frequent travel there grants legitimacy to his support of a continued American presence. Following his Listen to Audio


Download Audio as MP3
first visit to the country on July 21, Senator Barack Obama reports that the troop reduction timeline which he has proposed is favored and supported by Iraqi prime minister Nuri Kamal al Maliki.

In this context, former military officers and Iraq war veterans David Bellavia and Erik Swabb, who have just returned from Iraq, will add to the debate by sharing their day-to-day experiences in the area. Colin Kahl of the Center for a New American Security and Georgetown University, who has also recently visited Iraq, will respond. Panelists will discuss whether the successes prompted by the surge have made an American drawdown in troops acceptable or whether security and political advances require a sustained American presence to prevent a relapse. What are the differences between McCain and Obama’s plans for Iraq? How would each be implemented? AEI’s vice president for foreign and defense policy, Danielle Pletka, will moderate.

Agenda
12:00 p.m.
Registration and Luncheon
12:30
Presenters:
David Bellavia, former U.S. Army, Vets for Freedom
Captain Erik Swabb, U.S. Marine Corps, Vets for Freedom
Discussant:
Colin Kahl, Center for a New American Security
Moderator:

2:00 Adjournment

Event Summary

 

Iraq Veterans Bullish on Security Situation There, Worry about Political Division at Home

 

 

WASHINGTON, AUGUST 19, 2008--Iraq war veterans said at AEI on August 14 that the military surge has given Iraqis room to promote political stability and that artificial timelines for withdrawal are dangerous. One day after their return from a fact-finding trip to Iraq, Vets for Freedom cofounder David Bellavia and member Erik Swabb, both of whom served in the battle for Fallujah in 2004, offered their most recent assessment.

"The surge allowed the situation for [Iraqis] to realize that they would do better working in the government than fighting," Swabb explained.

Bellavia added, "To pull out [of Iraq] on a timeline is like a SWAT team coming into a bank and saying 'No matter what, at nine o'clock, we are out of here'. . . . It is an improving situation, it is a dynamic situation, and, unfortunately, it is a fragile situation."

Colin Kahl, a professor at Georgetown University and a senior fellow at the Center for New American Security, agreed that the security situation in Iraq has vastly improved, but he contended that the current strategy remains insufficient. "Iraqis have begun to find their footing, [but] no one is doing a victory dance . . . because none of the sectarian differences have been addressed."

Kahl disagreed with Bellavia and Swabb about what steps should be taken next to secure Iraq's future. He predicted that changes would have to be made to the strategy in order to force Iraqi leaders to reconcile competing political groups. He argued that the United States should use credible leverage to make support "contingent upon accommodation." It is not constructive, Kahl said, simply "to cut [Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al] Maliki a blank check."

All three speakers noted that the increasingly partisan nature of the debate over the U.S. role in Iraq has hampered progress there. "There is no place on a dogtag for a political party," Bellavia said. "What we cannot do is carry our political flag and use it to stick our thumb in the eye of the other side. Let us get the best minds regardless of where they come from to work on the future of Iraq together."

--ARIEL FARRAR-WELLMAN

For video, audio, and more information about this event, visit www.aei.org/event1768/. For more information about AEI scholars' work on Iraq, visit www.aei.org/AEIonIraq/.

For media inquiries, contact Veronique Rodman at 202.862.4870 or vrodman@aei.org.

###

View complete summary.
Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine

What's new on AEI

image The Fed can't save the stock market again
image Obama's IRS and AP scandals cast big chill on free speech
image Organic industry's credibility eroded by misinformation about GE foods
image It's not universal coverage
AEI Participants

 

Danielle
Pletka

  • As a long-time Senate Committee on Foreign Relation senior professional staff member for the Near East and South Asia, Danielle Pletka was the point person on Middle East, Pakistan, India and Afghanistan issues. As the vice president for foreign and defense policy studies at AEI, Pletka writes on national security matters with a focus on Iran and weapons proliferation, the Middle East, Syria, Israel and the Arab Spring. She also studies and writes about South Asia: Pakistan, India and Afghanistan.


    Pletka is the co-editor of “Dissent and Reform in the Arab World: Empowering Democrats” (AEI Press, 2008) and the co-author of “Containing and Deterring a Nuclear Iran” (AEI Press, 2011). Her most recent study, “Iranian influence in the Levant, Egypt, Iraq, and Afghanistan,” was published in May 2012. She is currently working on a follow-up report on U.S.–Iranian competitive strategies in the Middle East, to be published in the summer of 2013.


  • Phone: 202-862-5943
    Email: dpletka@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Alexandra Della Rocchetta
    Phone: 202-862-7152
    Email: alex.dellarocchetta@aei.org
AEI on Facebook