The Economic and Legal Consequences of Requiring the Expensing of Employee Stock Options without Specifying the Valuation Method

AEI's working paper series
Download file The full text of this paper is available as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

Summary

Since mid-2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board has been pressed to require that companies include the "fair value" of employee stock options, as calculated using an option-pricing model such as Black-Scholes, as an expense in their GAAP financial statements. However, existing models for valuing options, including Black-Scholes, have serious deficiencies when used on long-term options.

The authors find that requiring companies to expense options in the absence of any satisfactory method to evaluate their costs would be inconsistent with the principles and objectives of accounting and would create serious legal risks for companies.

Kevin A. Hassett is the director of economic policy studies and a resident scholar at AEI. Peter J. Wallison is a resident fellow at AEI.

About the Author

 

Kevin A.
Hassett
  • Before joining AEI, Mr. Hassett was a senior economist at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and an associate professor of economics and finance at the Graduate School of Business of Columbia University, as well as a policy consultant to the Treasury Department during the George H. W. Bush and Clinton administrations. He served as an economic adviser to the George W. Bush 2004 presidential campaign and as Senator John McCain's chief economic adviser during the 2000 presidential primaries. He also served as a senior economic adviser to the McCain 2008 presidential campaign. Mr. Hassett is a columnist for National Review.

  • Phone: 202-862-7157
    Email: khassett@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Veronika Polakova
    Phone: 202-862-4880
    Email: veronika.polakova@aei.org

 

Peter J.
Wallison
AEI on Facebook