Money market funds -- a solution?

Statement No. 342: Money market funds -- a solution?

Download PDF
There has been an ongoing controversy over whether money market funds (MMFs) pose a possible risk of systemic runs because of the prevailing policy of redeeming shares at a fixed par value of $1 even if the net asset value (NAV) of a share has fallen below that number. The risk is that shareholders may rush to redeem at the par value before the fund is forced by declines in portfolio value to "break the buck" and redeem at the lower NAV.

It has been reported that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is considering a proposed resolution to the question by making a distinction between two kinds of funds: 'government' funds (invested only in government securities) and 'prime' funds (invested more broadly in corporate and other securities), and require only the prime funds to redeem at a 'floating' NAV. Many MMFs are already disclosing their daily NAV, which enables shareholders to judge whether they are approaching a break point, and the Committee would support adopting a rule to that effect.

Institutional shareholders with large accounts are far more likely to respond to small declines below a $1 par and redeem, so some in the industry have urged that the floating NAV apply to all institutional funds, a position the committee has previously endorsed (Statement No. 309, February 14, 2011). There is a better case to be made for allowing sponsors of retail prime funds (with much smaller accounts) to continue a policy of redemption at par if they so choose (incurring at times the possible cost of making some contributions to the fund's capital). How tenable that policy would prove to be, in the light of daily posting of the portfolio NAV, would be determined by management's investment policy and willingness to absorb some capital losses in order to maintain par redemption. But the decision could be left to management judgment in individual retail funds, rather than a universal regulatory mandate, with little prospect of wide-spread runs posing systemic risk to the financial stability of the United States. This course might facilitate an end to the SEC deadlock on the issue.

 

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine

What's new on AEI

image Getting it right: US national security policy and al Qaeda since 2011
image Net neutrality rundown: What the NPRM means for you
image The Schuette decision
image Snatching failure from victory in Afghanistan
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Event Registration is Closed
Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

Event Registration is Closed
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.