Solar radiation management: An evolving climate policy option

Sun by Shutterstock.com

Article Highlights

  • Solar radiation management would seek to enhance and manage the atmosphere's natural reflective qualities.

    Tweet This

  • In contrast to greenhouse gas control, solar radiation management may offer a cost-effective way of managing the risk of crossing climate tipping points.

    Tweet This

  • If climate change is a significant problem, then solar radiation management could be part of a significant solution.

    Tweet This

  • Effective greenhouse gas control would require a hefty willingness to pay for it in Beijing, Delhi, Moscow, and Washington.

    Tweet This

Subscribe to AEI's energy and environment emails
Articles and events on energy and the environment. Published approximately monthly.

First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Zip Code:

 

Executive Summary

Measures to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have long dominated public discourse about responses to man-made climate change. However, major institutional and political hurdles dim future prospects for controlling emissions. While adaptation to climate change can accomplish much, flawed institutions are likely to limit its efficacy.

Solar radiation management (SRM) appears to promise at least some capacity to offset the warming caused by the rising atmospheric GHG concentrations. SRM would seek to enhance and manage physical processes that currently reflect sunlight back into space. For example, most researchers have envisioned implementing this concept by adding to the layer of sulfuric acid that is already present in the lower stratosphere. All else remaining equal, global mean temperatures would fall even though GHG levels would not; the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimates that physical processes such as these already offset about 40 percent of global warming. By lessening the rise in temperature, SRM might lessen some of the risks of global warming.

Recent technical developments have advanced our understanding of important aspects of SRM. First, the regional impacts of SRM will be variable and these differences are likely to become a source of disagreement regarding SRM deployment. Second, given the uncertainties about SRM technologies, there is a pressing need for research and development funding. Third, in contrast to GHG control, SRM may offer a cost-effective way of managing the risk of crossing climate tipping points.

The debate over SRM continues to evolve slowly. Two trends are visible. First, climate change as an issue has lost political salience. Second, SRM’s visibility has been rising. The greater focus on SRM has led to a growing debate about its proper governance. So far, only a very narrow range of experts and interests have joined this debate. Even so, no consensus seems to be at hand. Disagreement exists even among environmental advocacy groups.

The economic benefits of a successful SRM program would flow from a reduction in climate damages owing to warming, and a reduction in economic damage caused by GHG controls. Determining the optimal amount of GHG controls to implement in the presence of SRM is an ongoing research effort. Some argue (1) that SRM should be held in reserve and only used in the case of an “emergency,” which is never precisely defined, and (2) that no change should be made to plans for emissions reductions such as they are. Others suggest that SRM may augment an emissions reduction program by providing near-term benefits and risk reduction while low carbon energy sources are developed.

SRM’s precise value remains uncertain; however, it seems clear that its potential benefit is very large—on par with the damages brought by climate change itself. In other words, if climate change is a significant problem, then SRM could be part of a significant solution.

The incentives for using SRM appear to be stronger than those for GHG control. Much analysis has used this valid point to conjecture that SRM would be easy to deploy—indeed, that it would be too easy. This fear is largely misguided. Global power politics militate against any state bidding for sole control of an SRM system. In short, SRM remains a speculative option; nonetheless, a workable SRM system could offer a highly useful backup and supplement to current policy options.

Read the full paper.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine

What's new on AEI

Rebuilding American defense: A speech by Governor Bobby Jindal
image Smelling liberal, thinking conservative
image Stopping Ebola before it turns into a pandemic
image All too many reasons for pessimism about Europe
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 20
    MON
  • 21
    TUE
  • 22
    WED
  • 23
    THU
  • 24
    FRI
Monday, October 20, 2014 | 2:00 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Warfare beneath the waves: The undersea domain in Asia

We welcome you to join us for a panel discussion of the undersea military competition occurring in Asia and what it means for the United States and its allies.

Event Registration is Closed
Tuesday, October 21, 2014 | 8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters

AEI’s Election Watch is back! Please join us for two sessions of the longest-running election program in Washington, DC. 

Event Registration is Closed
Wednesday, October 22, 2014 | 1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.
What now for the Common Core?

We welcome you to join us at AEI for a discussion of what’s next for the Common Core.

Thursday, October 23, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.
Brazil’s presidential election: Real challenges, real choices

Please join AEI for a discussion examining each candidate’s platform and prospects for victory and the impact that a possible shift toward free-market policies in Brazil might have on South America as a whole.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.