Choice and competition in health care

Chapter 3 of Pioneer Insitute's The Great Experiment

Choice and Competition in Health Care

 

Chapter 3 of The Great Experiment

Download PDF

 

 

  • Empower consumers with more diverse and affordable health benefits choices by “competitive federalism” that exposes exclusive state-based health care regulation to competing brands of regulation offered in other states
  • Interstate regulatory competition would provide an escape valve from arbitrary or discriminatory regulatory policies at either the state or federal levels
  • Key design requirements include clear regulatory primacy, domicile-based regulatory choice, incentives and responsibilities for the primary state regulatory, thorough disclosure and informed choice, and multi-state solvency arrangements
  • Several mechanisms to facilitate interstate completion in health insurance regulation might include adopting an “insurer domicile” rule to determine applicable law and regulatory authority, states granting regulatory due deference to out-of-state regulators, or interstate compacts to authorize sale of purchase of insurance offered by out-of-state insurers
  • Permitting greater competition and choice in regulation of health insurance could strengthen competition to attract and retain customers, reduce insurance premiums, and increase demand for such insurance policies
  • The impact of regulatory competition will be greatest on states that are regulatory outliers rather than on all states across the board.
  • The goal is better regulation, not no regulation at all
  • Aggregation of as much health care data as can be accurately and securely derived from multiple sources is a necessary, but not sufficient, early step in developing a more transparent and value-conscious health care system. States can make an important contribution to the data collection and data sharing process
  • States should start with more tangible measurement and reporting of the relative costs of routine and frequent health care services, actual out-of-pocket costs consumers are likely to face, and how patients evaluate their own care experience with different providers.
  • Better provider-level performance measurement could construct state health care regulation that relies more on providing useful information to consumers instead of mandating or limiting their choices

 

More information about The Great Experiment is available here

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Thomas P.
Miller
  • Thomas Miller is a former senior health economist for the Joint Economic Committee (JEC). He studies health care policy and regulation. A former trial attorney, journalist, and sports broadcaster, Mr. Miller is the co-author of Why ObamaCare Is Wrong For America (HarperCollins 2011) and heads AEI's "Beyond Repeal & Replace" health reform project. He has testified before Congress on issues including the uninsured, health care costs, Medicare prescription drug benefits, health insurance tax credits, genetic information, Social Security, and federal reinsurance of catastrophic events. While at the JEC, he organized a number of hearings that focused on reforms in private health care markets, such as information transparency and consumer-driven health care.
  • Phone: 202-862-5886
    Email: tmiller@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Catherine Griffin
    Phone: 202-862-5920
    Email: catherine.griffin@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image How to beat Memorial Day traffic forever
image Bernanke stumbles, markets react
image Don't edit the First Amendment
image Home Economics
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 27
    MON
  • 28
    TUE
  • 29
    WED
  • 30
    THU
  • 31
    FRI
Wednesday, May 29, 2013 | 4:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.
Solar radiation management: An evolving climate policy option

As the controversy over climate policy has grown, it has been said that greenhouse gas (GHG) control is too hard but solar radiation management (SRM) is too easy. Join AEI for a discussion of the potential economic benefits, as well as the risks of SRM with Lee Lane, J. Eric Bickel and Nobel Laureate Thomas Schelling. A reception will follow.

Thursday, May 30, 2013 | 12:00 p.m. – 2:15 p.m.
Public employee pensions: How large are the deficits? What changes can be made?

At this event, panelists will address pension reform challenges by presenting the results of three research papers commissioned by AEI through a generous grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation.

Friday, May 31, 2013 | 9:15 a.m. – 11:15 a.m.
Long-term care: Markets or mandates?

Mark Warshawsky, a well-known expert in retirement finance and a newly appointed commissioner, will explain the implications of a publicly funded long-term care insurance program. Then a panel will debate whether another government program the best way to ensure that families can afford to provide the necessary services for their aging loved ones.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.