In the latest American Enterprise Institute (AEI) Health Policy Outlook, AEI adjunct scholars H.E. Frech, Stephen T. Parente, and AEI visiting scholar John S. Hoff demonstrate that the comparisons of different countries' health care system performances by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) do not provide a full picture. The standards used by the OECD are unable to adequately differentiate between health system performance and other confounding factors that determine health. This is particularly relevant for America because these flawed results have been used to call for health care reform in the U.S.
Among the key points:
- The United States spends substantially more per capita on health care than other developed countries, yet commonly cited reports indicate that the U.S. does not have superior health system performance.
- The OECD uses mortality metrics to measure health care system performance, but these data do not adequately indicate health status differences and do not accurately judge health care system efficiency.
- The OECD and other researchers must adjust their methods for measuring infant mortality, life expectancy, and premature mortality and control for confounding factors such as lifestyle to give a more accurate picture of health system performance.
H.E. Frech III ([email protected]) is an adjunct scholar at AEI and a professor in the Department of Economics at the University of California, Santa Barbara; Stephen T. Parente ([email protected]) is an adjunct scholar at AEI and a professor in the Department of Finance at the Carlson School of Management at the University of Minnesota; and John S. Hoff ([email protected]) is a visiting scholar at AEI and was health attaché to the U.S. mission to the OECD from 2005 to 2009.
For additional help, other media inquiries, or to reserve AEI's in-house TV studio or ISDN facilities, please contact [email protected] or 202.862.5823.