About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  Poverty and Marriage, Income Inequality and Brains
Poverty and Marriage, Income Inequality and Brains
Print Mail
By Charles Murray
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2008
ARTICLES
Pathways  (Winter 2008)
Publication Date: January 1, 2008

 
W. H. Brady Scholar
 Charles Murray
 

Download file Click here to view the full text of this article as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

It may be said with only a little exaggeration that policy analysts are happy describing the causes of problems while ignoring their solution, and politicians are happy proposing solutions to problems while ignoring their causes. At least, such is the case with poverty and income inequality. I fit the bill for the policy analyst, lacking any politically feasible solutions. But the articles of the three presidential candidates fit the bill too, written as if we have a set of solutions ready to go, awaiting only a chance, whether they be Hillary Clinton's home visitation program that produces 56 percent fewer arrests among participants than nonparticipants, Barack Obama's Harlem Children's Zone that is "literally saving a generation of children in a neighborhood where they were never supposed to have a chance," or John Edwards's million government-created "stepping stone jobs" that will get unemployed young men into work.

Variants of all such remedies have been tried repeatedly since 1964. They typically were greeted with early and well-publicized claims of success. When the technical evaluations were published (and seldom publicized), it turned out that the early successes were temporary or that they never really existed. It was this monotonous pattern that led Peter Rossi, the nation's leading scholar in the evaluation of social programs, to formulate Rossi's Iron Law of Program Evaluation: "The expected value of any net impact assessment of any large scale social
program is zero."

The cycle of optimistic promises and zero results will repeat itself, because once again the politicians are ignoring causes that don't fit the way they want the world to be. In the case of poverty, they ignore the causal role of the failure to marry. In the case of increasing income inequality, they ignore the causal role of the rising market value of brains.

Charles Murray is the W. H. Brady Scholar in Culture and Freedom at AEI.

Download file Click here to view the full text of this article as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

Related Links
Related book by Murray: In Our Hands: A Plan to Replace the Welfare State
Related article on the intellectually gifted by Murray
Related On the Issues on education and intelligence by Murray
Related article on happiness and inequality by Arthur C. Brooks
AEI Print Index No. 22632


Also by Charles Murray
Recent Articles
College Daze
Leave This Child Behind
For Most People, College Is a Waste of Time
Latest Book
Real Education
Four Simple Truths for Bringing America's Schools Back to Reality
Economic Outlook

Economic Outlook

In the August issue of Economic Outlook, John H. Makin warns that there is more trouble ahead for the economy.


Real Education
Real Education

In his new book, Real Education: Four Simple Truths for Bringing America's Schools Back to Reality, AEI's Charles Murray focuses on four simple, hard truths that are rarely discussed or even acknowledged by educators and politicians.