About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  The Uninsured and Affordability
The Uninsured and Affordability
Print Mail
Letter to the Editor
By Joseph Antos
Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Health Affairs  
Publication Date: March 8, 2008

Wilson H. Taylor Scholar Joseph Antos  
Wilson H. Taylor Scholar Joseph Antos
 
In their paper about mandating health insurance (Nov/Dec 07), Sherry Glied and colleagues offer suggestions for making such a mandate more effective in increasing the number of people with health coverage: compliance should be easy and relatively inexpensive, penalties for noncompliance should be large enough to matter but not too burdensome, and enforcement should be aggressive. An additional requirement, not mentioned by the authors, is widespread agreement by the public that the mandate is necessary and desirable--even when it is applied to them.

On all of these counts, a mandate is likely to fail if it is a prerequisite to reform and unnecessary if more difficult steps are taken to lower the cost of coverage and improve the value offered by health insurance. By focusing narrowly on the mechanics of a mandate, Glied and colleagues do not consider whether the coverage itself is affordable and attractive. Massachusetts' $219 tax penalty for 2007 for being uninsured pales into insignificance compared with a premium for single coverage, which ranges from $2,100 to more than $6,000 annually. The 2008 penalty jumps to as much as half the cost of the premium--too severe to be levied on many uninsured people. By exempting nearly 20 percent of uninsured adults, the state's Connector Board recognized that the mandate would be a continuing source of political controversy and ineffective in increasing unsubsidized coverage unless the cost of insurance could be brought down.

When a mandate appears necessary because people are not willing to buy insurance, it is unsustainable. The solution is not tougher noncompliance penalties or higher taxes to finance more generous subsidies or more restrictive insurance regulation. Instead of attempting to micromanage the health sector, sensible policy would take advantage of market incentives to reduce inefficiency and promote a high-value health care system.

Joseph Antos is the Wilson H. Taylor Scholar in Health Care and Retirement Policy at AEI.

Related Links
Related testimony on living without health insurance by Antos
Related testimony on improving access to health care by Antos
AEI Print Index No. 22931


Also by Joseph Antos
Recent Articles
Treading Water
Have Health Reformers Forgotten Medicare?
Financing the U.S. Health System
Latest Book
Restoring Fiscal Sanity 2007
The Health Spending Challenge
Latin American Outlook

In the latest edition of Latin American Outlook, Roger F. Noriega says that Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has made impressive strides, but he needs to take on lingering economic and political reforms.


Making a Killing
Making a Killing

In Making a Killing: The Deadly Implications of the Counterfeit Drug Trade, AEI resident fellow Roger Bate analyzes the burgeoning international trade in counterfeit drugs and recommends steps that governments and law enforcement agencies could take to stop it.