Bradford (Brad) Wilcox is a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where he directs The Home Economics Project. Inaugurated in fall of 2013, the research project explores the links between family structure and economic growth in 20 countries around the world — more specifically, how marriage and a strong family life foster free enterprise.
Wilcox is also an associate professor in the department of sociology at the University of Virginia, where he directs the National Marriage Project. He is a fellow at the Institute for Studies of Religion at Baylor University and has been a research fellow at Yale University, a research associate at Princeton University, and a Civitas Fellow at the Brookings Institution. He is additionally the author of “When Marriage Disappears: The Retreat from Marriage in Middle America” and the coauthor, with Kathleen Kovner Kline, of “Biological and Social Scientific Perspectives.”
Wilcox has a master’s degree and a doctorate in sociology from Princeton University. His bachelor’s degree in government is from the University of Virginia.
Director, National Marriage Project, University of Virginia, 2009–present
Assistant Professor, 2002–08; Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Virginia, 2008–present,
Research Fellow, Institute for Advanced Study of Religion, Yale University, 2001–02
Research Associate, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs and the Office of Population Research, Princeton University, 2000–01
Public policies and cultural norms related to work and family should be geared toward maximizing flexibility, rather than locking in approaches geared to serving full-time, dual-income families, and toward renewing the employment opportunities of poor and working-class men who have become less “marriageable” in recent years.
Alas, in his State of the Union address tonight, President Barack Obama did not go there. He did not engage one of the biggest issues blocking the mobility agenda he articulated: the divided state of our unions.
Accepting the reality of family breakdown--as a new report from Maria Shriver and the Center for American Progress suggests--and doing nothing to renew the two-parent family would lock in profoundly unequal and regressive trends in American life.
Economic inequality is the “defining challenge of our time,” President Barack Obama declared in a speech last month to the Center for American Progress. Inequality is dangerous, he argued, not merely because it’s unseemly to have a large gap between the rich and the poor, but because inequality, itself, destroys upward mobility, making it harder for the poor to escape from poverty.
A new report today from the Center for Contemporary Families called marriage an "ineffective weapon in the War on Poverty." It is not news that marriage is not a panacea for poor single mothers. But does that mean we should accept the growing marriage divide between the rich and the poor?