The question of whether the Constitution protects against sex discrimination is the hardest one for those truly committed to following the original understanding of the Constitution.

Justice Clarence Thomas's decisive opinion in McDonald v. Chicago, which held that the Second Amendment limits the power of the states, was principled jurisprudence based clearly on the text of the Constitution.

Central to the genius of the Constitution's design are the mechanisms to change it, and while the Amendment process is often arduous, the American people can do a better job of tinkering with the Constitution than Supreme Court justices.

It's racially discriminatory to prohibit racial discrimination. That's the bottom line of a decision issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit.

The court's rationale in Midwest Railcar Repair v. South Dakota Department of Revenue and Regulation contradicts basic principles of public finance economics.

Elena Kagan is continuing the process of Supreme Court nominees saying as little as possible in confirmation hearings, despite her past statements that the hearing process has become a sham.

As has been generally understood and underscored by Standard & Poor's downgrade of the U.S.'s AAA credit rating, elected officials were willing to push the federal government to the brink of default. This was startling proof of deep dysfunction in the political process.

Some on the lefthave already started labeling Judge Alito as "racist" because of his 1985 job application's single-word reference to "reapportionment."