God bless the ACLU for cleansing the public life of the United States, at last, of discriminatory religious speech.

Rather than have the government stretch the meaning of statutes and evidence, Congress and the president should enact a statute that straightforwardly makes it illegal to publish or circulate materials that support, praise, or advocate terrorism as long as we are still formally at war with al Qaeda and its allies.

This was CBS's first and only debate--and it showed.

This volume sets the stage for a reasoned and robust discussion of the meaning of 9/11 and the law and policy of the war on terrorism.

The Obama administration is expanding its use of drones to target terrorists while shrinking the legal ground on which the attacks are based, isolating the CIA and putting drone operators at greater risk.

The Obama administration is standing by a brief filed by the Bush administration in a case in the war on terrorism, rebuffing its most left-wing supporters.

And that's the point, really. If captured alive, terrorists pose political problems for Obama. Where do we put them? How do we interrogate them? And, most pressingly, how do we try them? I don't think those are tough questions. But Obama does. So he prefers to kill these people outright, avoiding the questions altogether.

President Obama's decision to put Anwar al-Awlaki on a secret assassination list begs the question--can Congress's authorization of the president's right to use necessary and appropriate military force likewise authorize a President-approved assassination?