In January of this year, the number of manufacturing jobs increased by 50,000. Yet this vibrant sector is being held back—and not by imports.

An upcoming that questions the disparity between the number of men and women in certain academic fields appears to be less science than political polemic.

Gender bias has been a hot button topic of discrimination for many years, but after analyzing 20 years of data, two Cornell professors have concluded that, in academic science, women are treated just as well as men.

Women are joining men as partners in running the world, but they are not replacing men and never will. Yes, women are flourishing in unprecedented and gratifying ways. But men have hardly vanished from the center.

The Senate may soon pass a bill, already passed in the House, based on the false assumption that women still face rampant pay discrimination in the workplace.

Gender bias is the usual explanation for why few women reach the top levels of academic science, but what if the explanation is more complex than that?

What is good for women's basketball may not be good for nuclear physics.

The fight against terrorism is no closer to success today than it was a decade ago when, in the wake of the September 11 terror attacks, President George W. Bush declared a Global War on Terrorism.