It's comfortable living in a cocoon -- associating only with those who share your views, reading journalism and watching news that only reinforce them, avoiding those on the other side of the cultural divide.

Liberals have been doing this for a long time. In 1972 the movie critic Pauline Kael said...

Every federal official has an obligation to act in line with the Constitution as he or she understands it. And that doesn't necessarily mean obeying Supreme Court decisions.

As the Supreme Court considers President Obama's health care law, these pieces are 'must read' works on the case and the future of American health care.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear cases challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare and has allotted an apparently unprecedented five and a half hours for oral argument on four separate issues.

Waiting to act until the Supreme Court has made its decision on ObamaCare proves risky for all involved. 

Health care policy and health care reform are back in the news in a big way. The Supreme Court is poised to hear oral arguments on the constitutionality of the 2010 health care overhaul. The Obama administration has just released guidelines for the operation of the state-based insurance exchanges that are the backbone of the law.

At this forum, distinguished constitutional law scholars and health policy researchers will examine what we have learned thus far from the appellate litigation challenging the Affordable Care Act of 2010.

Constitutional law expert Michael Greve warns that overlooked cases, already before the Court and involving enormous amounts of money, have potentially huge implications for the future of ObamaCare.