The proposed increase in the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage is a misguided approach for giving temporary aid to the states.

Panelists discuss Thomas W. Grannemann and Mark V. Pauly's newly released book, Reform Medicaid First: Laying the Foundation for National Health Care Reform.

Medicaid matching rate reform has long been recognized as needed on equity grounds.

Repealing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will not be enough, for a simple reason: Although Obamacare would worsen many of the problems with our system of health-care financing, that system clearly does call out for serious reform.

Based on our reading of the evidence, the Supplemental Security Income-disabled children program has increasingly become a more general welfare program that in large part targets a population of able-bodied single mothers that overlaps with the TANF population.

Significant differences among state Medicaid programs will hinder national health care reform.

A new approach to reform is needed, one that levels with the American people about what is possible and what is necessary. AEI scholars Joseph Antos and Thomas P. Miller have written a realistic, market-based proposal.

Using vouchers and other forms of bottom-up decision making can help give clients choice and improve services.