Those hoping for Social Security reform, including reforms based on individual savings accounts, should not make the same mistake again.

In a recent column, The Washington Post’s Fact Checker declared Rep. Ron Paul votes against “virtually every piece of legislation that could be interpreted as government overreach or interference with the free market.” There one small problem with the analysis: It ignores the fact that Paul is one of the biggest pork-barrel earmarkers on Capitol Hill. 

Pushing government decisions down to the lowest democratic level possible — while protecting basic civil rights — guarantees that more people will have a say in how they live their lives.

Perry's breathtaking failure to remember his own third department to abolish and Cain's stumbling and inconsistent responses to the charges against him leave a gaping vacuum to fill.

The November 22 Republican presidential candidates’ debate, sponsored by the American Enterprise Institute (where I am a resident fellow) and the Heritage Foundation, and presented by CNN, was probably the most substantive and serious presidential debate of this election cycle.

One would think that lawmakers might want to refrain from nakedly self-centered activities for the sake of Americans' security. Wrong.

An invitation to the world that works.

The television documentary tells history as never before.