The Democratic chairmen of the House and Senate committees that oversaw health reform have weight on the interpretation of the law, in effect arguing that insurers would have to spend even more money on medical expenses to offset every dollar they spend on administrative costs.

Two years after its enactment, ObamaCare remains unpopular, unaffordable and unworkable. This week, three days of oral argument before the Supreme Court should confirm that it’s also unconstitutional.

Liberals typically erupt in outrage if you suggest they don’t respect or understand the Constitution, let alone defend it.  But then they let slip that in fact they really don’t respect or understand the Constitution.

This return to two-party government creates a tougher political climate for the White House in implementing health care reform.

His stances for limited government and individual freedom make him the left's lightning rod and the tea party's intellectual godfather. And he is only halfway through the 40 years he may sit on the high court.

Experts take questions on ObamaCare, the legislation surrounding it, and the detrimental impact it will have on the economy, on our health sector, and on our freedom.

Elena Kagan's inability to understand the limited judicial role implied by the Constitution combined with her complete lack of experience, sparse academic writings, and deliberately evasive testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee makes her unfit to serve on the Supreme Court.

Friedrich Hayek, the famous free-market critic of central planning, were he alive today, would have the same views as US conservatives about ObamaCare and the Dodd-Frank Act.