Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is writing divisive opinions that will keep the Court an ideological battleground.

John G. Roberts Jr.'s experience as an attorney for U.S. corporations bodes well for the future of tort reform.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg likes the Indian Health Care Improvement Act and other ingredients of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, aka “Obamacare.” Why, she asked toward the end of three days of hearings, shouldn’t the court keep the good stuff in Obamacare and just dump the unconstitutional bits?

Political dysfunction. Partisanship at record levels. Attack politics run amok. And public approval of Congress scraping the single digits (Sen. John McCain is fond of saying it's down to blood rlatives and paid staff).

Jan. 21 is an auspicious day, for two reasons. It is the date of the South Carolina primary, and it is the second anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision.

Elena Kagan, nominated by President Obama to serve as the next Supreme Court Justice, has the potential to significantly influence the direction of the Court.

Rather than await the decision on the Affordable Care Act, President Obama decided to attack preemptively with error-filled claims about the place of judicial review in our constitutional system. Judicial review springs from the duty of a court, when deciding a case before it, to enforce the Constitution over a conflicting act of Congress.

The Supreme Court is highly regarded by the American people in part because it sticks to its business and keeps its profile low.