Even though President Barack Obama will certainly nominate a liberal to the Supreme Court, he could still nominate a jurist who believes in judicial restraint, unlike Justice John Paul Stevens.

What I find most fascinating about the debate over corporate personhood is the fact that the people who defend corporate personhood don't anthropomorphize big business nearly as much as those who oppose it.

President Obama's focus on Supreme Court nominees that have empathy for the little guy amounts to nothing more than state-sanctioned prejudice, violating the ideal of impartial justice.

Former senator Ted Stevens was a good senator for Alaskans, and he did service to the nation.

Elena Kagan, nominated by President Obama to serve as the next Supreme Court Justice, has the potential to significantly influence the direction of the Court.

The Supreme Court recently made a decision about the Indiana voter-ID law.

The Supreme Court has previously held that individuals have a fundamental right to make personal health care choices without government interference, which may support a challenge to the constitutionality of ObamaCare.

The court's rationale in Midwest Railcar Repair v. South Dakota Department of Revenue and Regulation contradicts basic principles of public finance economics.