The European Union (EU) has announced plans to levy a tax on airline emissions for all planes landing and taking off from EU airports. This tax would be calculated not only based on mileage flown in EU airspace but also for the entire length of the flight (thus, Chinese and Japanese airlines would be taxed for an entire journey from Beijing or Tokyo).

Some people dispute that science fiction predicts reality. Those people should be referred to the recent changes in the debate over climate change.

It is time policymakers recognize that despite the claims of renewable energy and efficiency hucksters, we do not have the technologies needed to significantly curb greenhouse gas emissions without causing massive economic disruption.

Current climate policy is in a fairly strong state of confusion, as is the climate science underlying the debate of that policy.

By conflating creationism with climate skepticism, creationists can only harm their fellow man by greasing the skids for draconian climate policies.

The political theater in Copenhagen shows that we need realistic answers that do not require economic suicide to address the challenge of rising global temperatures.

Kenneth P. Green responds to questions Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.) asked him about climate change during recent testimony before the Senate Committee on Finance.

Cap-and-trade is an inappropriate policy tool for the control of greenhouse gases that will cause significant economic harm with little or no environmental benefit.