Search Results
-
FILTER BY DATEAll Time
-
-
FILTER BY RELEVANCEMost Relevant
-
-
FILTER BY CONTENT TYPEAll Content Types
-
Obama slowed things down to set up the play he wanted rather than the play the moment needed. As a result, Ghadafi regained his balance.
The U.N. resolution could end up protecting Gaddafi and guaranteeing the survival of his regime.
While the outcome of NATO's intervention in Libya is still uncertain, the ongoing drift toward a negotiated solution is fraught with potentially debilitating problems for the Western alliance.
Gaddafi succeeding could be disastrous for American national security.
Now that Obama has condemned Gaddafi, we should take a page from Reagan and equip and train the Libyan people to fight for their own liberty.
Attacking Qaddafi’s military equipment—whether it is threatening civilian populations or not—is an essential next step, but it does not guarantee success for the rebels, still less for the United States.
President Obama's inaction in the face of Libyan leader Moammar Qaddafi's counteroffensive will have lasting consequences.
When it came to justifying the limited goals of the military mission, Obama's speech was fundamentally dishonest. Such dishonesty is unfortunate, because the success of our intervention in Libya is critical.



